Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26003218›Full record

ReviewTrends in genetics : TIG2015

It's more than stamp collecting: how genome sequencing can unify biological research.

Stephen Richards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Why sequence all eukaryotes?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Carotenoid modifying enzymes in metazoans.Methods in enzymology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cytochrome P450 diversity in the tree of life.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A golden goat genome.Nature genetics · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen RichardsHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: stephenr@bcm.edu.

Funding

The Human Genome Sequencing CenterU54HG003273 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GIBBS, RICHARD A · 2004 to 2015
$341.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of reference genome sequences, especially the human reference, has revolutionized the study of biology. However, while the genomes of some species have been fully sequenced, a wide range of biological problems still cannot be effectively studied for lack of genome sequence information. Here, I identify neglected areas of biology and describe how both targeted species sequencing and more broad taxonomic surveys of the tree of life can address important biological questions. I enumerate the significant benefits that would accrue from sequencing a broader range of taxa, as well as discuss the technical advances in sequencing and assembly methods that would allow for wide-ranging application of whole-genome analysis. Finally, I suggest that in addition to 'big science' survey initiatives to sequence the tree of life, a modified infrastructure-funding paradigm would better support reference genome sequence generation for research communities most in need.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNADNA sequencingeukaryoteseukaryotic genomicsgenome analysisgenome assemblygenome infrastructure fundinggenome reference sequencesLong read sequencing technologiestaxanomic genome surveystree of life

Identifiers

PMID26003218
PMCPMC4490122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.