ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2015
Predicting time to emergency department return for anxiety disorders and acute stress reactions in children and adolescents: a cohort study.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Follow-up After Pediatric Mental Health Emergency Visits.Pediatrics · 2023Article
- The relationship between outpatient service use and emergency department visits among people treated for mental and substance use disorders: analysis of population-based administrative data in British Columbia, Canada.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Trends and Predictors of Repeat Mental Health Visits to a Pediatric Emergency Department in Hamilton, Ontario.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2019Article
- Predicting Emergency Department Visits.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWhile studies indicate that few children with anxiety disorders receive specialized mental health care, significant knowledge gaps exist for the mental health care trajectory outside of specialized care. We examined whether physician-based care after an emergency department (ED) visit for mental health care predicted time to ED return.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data from Alberta, Canada. Included in the cohort were 8075 children <18 years discharged from an ED (104 EDs in total), April 2002-September 2010, following a visit for an anxiety disorder or acute stress reaction. We used a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to estimate time to ED return for mental health care (censored at 90 days). The variables of interest were: number and type of physician visits 30 days after index visit. We adjusted for sociodemographics, clinical acuity, comorbidity, and recent history of ED mental health care in the model.
resultsWithin 30 days of ED discharge, multiple physician follow-up visits were associated with shorter return time (adjusted HR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.08-1.43). A single physician follow-up visit was associated with longer return time (adjusted HR 0.68, 95 % CI 0.58-0.79). Physician follow-up visits for mental health care were associated with shorter return time (adjusted HR 2.5, 95 % CI 2.21-2.83).
conclusionsFollowing an index visit, ED return by children with anxiety disorders or acute stress reactions is associated with specific characteristics of subsequent physician visits. Improving physician use of evidence-based treatment and family access to coordinated services may reduce costly hospital-based care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.