Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26002351›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2015

Management of brain arteriovenous malformations.

Sherri A Braksick, Jennifer E Fugate

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sherri A BraksickMayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Jennifer E Fugate

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementArteriovenous malformations (AVMs) pose a risk of morbidity and mortality throughout an affected patient's lifetime. Over the course of a patient's life, the risk of hemorrhage is approximately 1-4 % per year, and after an initial hemorrhage occurs, this risk may be higher. Other causes of morbidity include seizures, headaches, or progressive neurologic deficits. Once an AVM has been discovered, the utility of attempted obliteration or surgical resection compared to the risk of intervention should be entertained. The characteristics of the malformation as well as the patient's overall health status contribute to the decision to intervene on these lesions. For small lesions located in superficial areas without high-risk surgical characteristics (low-grade Spetzler-Martin grades), it is reasonable to consider surgical resection. In lesions that pose high-risk of complications from surgical removal, intra-arterial embolization, radiosurgery, or a combination of the two may be reasonable treatment options. Some AVMs at traditional high surgical risk may be amenable to partial embolization, allowing initially high-risk lesions to become better candidates for surgical resection. In some patients, particularly those who are older or who have multiple medical comorbidities, the risk of intervention as compared to the annual hemorrhage risk may warrant conservative management as opposed to intervention. The overall treatment strategy must be based on patient and AVM characteristics and careful risk-benefit ratio analysis.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.