ArticleCritical care (London, England)2015
'Biomarking' infection during continuous renal replacement therapy: still relevant?
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tei Index and its Relation to Outcome of Critically Ill Children on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Body temperature and infection in critically ill patients on continuous kidney replacement therapy.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- Plasma exchange in critically ill COVID-19 patients improved inflammation, microcirculatory clot formation, and hypotension, thereby improving clinical outcomes: fact or fiction?Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Biomarkers in critical illness: have we made progress?International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2016Review
- Presepsin and sepsis-induced acute kidney injury treated with continuous renal replacement therapy: will another promising biomarker bite the dust?Critical care (London, England) · 2015Article
- Biomarker validity in the critically ill: all must face the (continuous) renal replacement challenge!Critical care (London, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.