ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2015
Special Considerations in Medical Screening for Participants in Remote Endurance Events.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-race medical screening and harm reduction approaches in ultra-endurance racing: A descriptive pilot study of global practice.JSAMS plus · 2025Article
- Preventing Casualties in Ultramarathons.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Recommendations on the Appropriate Level of Medical Support at Ultramarathons.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As participation at remote endurance events increases, so does the need to screen participants for potentially problematic medical conditions, but this process has been ill-defined to date. This article aims to outline a general approach to screening and discusses common or important medical conditions that may need consideration in the screening process. Medical conditions that are considered low risk may translate to high-risk conditions in the setting of a remote and austere location. Medical directors of remote endurance events should have a familiarity with assessing risks and applying informed consent principles to participation. While there are no specific standards on medical disqualification from an event based on medical history alone, several systematic considerations should be made that allow for an assessment of risk to an individual for a specific event. The medical director and event director, in discussion with the athlete and treating clinician when appropriate, should come to a consensus on participation when high-risk medical conditions become apparent during the screening process. Both modifications and accommodations to participation may be used to mitigate both clinical and medicolegal risk and allow for participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.