Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26002127›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2015

Contrast-enhanced MRI features in the early diagnosis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Robert Hemke, Taco W Kuijpers, Charlotte M Nusman, Dieneke Schonenberg-Meinema, Marion A J van Rossum, Koert M Dolman, J Merlijn van den Berg, Mario Maas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert HemkeDepartment of Radiology Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. r.hemke@amc.nl.
Taco W KuijpersDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte M NusmanDepartment of Radiology Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dieneke Schonenberg-MeinemaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marion A J van RossumDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Koert M DolmanDepartment of Pediatric Rheumatology, Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Merlijn van den BergDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Immunology, Rheumatology and Infectious Disease, Emma Children's Hospital AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mario MaasDepartment of Radiology Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLReade · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether clinical, laboratory or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) measures differentiate Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) from other forms of active childhood arthritis. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe prospectively collected data of 80 treatment-naïve patients clinically suspected of JIA with active non-infectious arthritis of (at least) one knee for <12 months duration. Upon presentation patients underwent clinical and laboratory assessments and contrast-enhanced MRI. MRI was not used as a diagnostic criterion.

resultsForty-four (55%) patients were clinically diagnosed with JIA, whereas in 36 (45%) patients the diagnosis of JIA was discarded on clinical or laboratory findings. MRI-based synovitis was present in 27 (61.4%) JIA patients and in 7 (19.4%) non-JIA patients (P < 0.001). Five factors (male gender, physician's global assessment of overall disease activity, joints with limited range of motion, HLA-B27, MRI-based synovitis) were associated with the onset of JIA. In multivariate analysis MRI-based synovitis proved to be independently associated with JIA (OR 6.58, 95% CI 2.36-18.33). In patients with MRI-based synovitis, the RR of having JIA was 3.16 (95% CI 1.6-6.4).

conclusionsThe presence of MRI-based synovitis is associated with the clinical onset of JIA. Physical examination could be supported by MRI, particularly to contribute in the early differentiation of different forms of non-infectious childhood arthritis. KEY POINTS: • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is a diagnosis of exclusion. • Differentiating JIA and other forms of childhood arthritis can be difficult. • MRI-techniques have substantially improved evaluation of joint abnormalities in JIA patients. • MRI-based synovitis is significantly associated with the clinical onset of JIA. • MRI could support physical examination in the early differentiation of childhood arthritis.

Indexed as

AdolescentArthritis, JuvenileChildContrast MediaEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansHypertrophyKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhysical ExaminationProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularSynovial MembraneSynovitisContrast MediaChildhood arthritisJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisKnee jointMagnetic Resonance ImagingSynovitis

Identifiers

PMID26002127
PMCPMC4595524
OpenAlexW346033689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.