Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26002112›Full record

ArticleSurgical innovation2016

Reducing Accidental Dislodgement of the Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: A Prospective Trial of the "SafetyBreak" Device.

Laura H Rosenberger, Christopher A Guidry, John P Davis, Tjasa Hranjec, Vonda K Johnston, Nolan A Wages, Christopher M Watson, Robert G Sawyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical innovation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. 'Re-PEGing': an endoscopic approach to inadvertent early removal of PEG tube.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Technique of endoscopic suturing of an enteral feeding tube to manage recurrent dislodgement.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura H RosenbergerUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA lhr2m@virginia.edu.
Christopher A GuidryUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
John P DavisUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Tjasa HranjecUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Vonda K JohnstonUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Nolan A WagesUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Christopher M WatsonPalmetto Health, Columbia, SC, USA.
Robert G SawyerUniversity of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

Surgical Infectious Diseses and Transplantation Training GrantT32AI078875 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SAWYER, ROBERT G · 2009 to 2013
$947k
NIAID NIH HHS 5-T32-AI-078875-03NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI078875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a ubiquitous feeding tube with high rates of accidental dislodgement, with significant morbidity and health care costs. We hypothesized use of a decoupling device is a safe and effective mechanism to reduce dislodgements. STUDY

designWe studied a prospective cohort of 100 patients from an academic center. Enrollment included patients requiring PEG tube placement with follow up extending through an individual's lifetime use of their PEG tube. The primary endpoint was accidental dislodgement of the principally placed PEG tube. The secondary endpoint was time to accidental dislodgement of the PEG tube.

resultsAll 100 patients received the SafetyBreak device and had complete follow-up. Half of the patients had at least a single episode of device decoupling, indicating prevention of dislodgement of the PEG. Eight patients ultimately had dislodgement, resulting in a significantly lower dislodgement rate when compared with a historical cohort (P = .036) and significantly longer survival of the PEG (log rank = 0.005). When compared with a concurrent cohort (without the device) there was also significantly lower dislodgement rate (P = .03) and a trend toward longer survival of the PEG (log rank = 0.08).

conclusionsWhen compared with both a historical and concurrent cohort of patients, the SafetyBreak device reduces accidental dislodgement of PEG tubes. As an increasing number of PEGs are being placed, an increasing number of patients are at risk for dislodgement. The SafetyBreak device is an innovative, economical solution to the problem of accidental dislodgement of the PEG tube.

Indexed as

AgedBiomedical EngineeringCohort StudiesEndoscopyEquipment DesignEquipment FailureFemaleGastrostomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetyProspective Studiesbiomedical engineeringflexible endoscopygastric surgeryinterventional endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID26002112
PMCPMC4699185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.