Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26001980›Full record

SynthesisThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

A meta-analysis of metronidazole and vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, stratified by disease severity.

Xiuzhen Di, Nan Bai, Xin Zhang, Bin Liu, Wentao Ni, Jin Wang, Kai Wang, Beibei Liang, Youning Liu, Rui Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Epidemiology ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Healthcare-AssociatedMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Management of severe and fulminantJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Management of Severe Colitis and Toxic Megacolon.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  10. Epidemiology and Outcomes of RecurrentOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Which is the Preferred Regimen for Non-SevereInfection & chemotherapy · 2022
    Review
  14. Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Burden ofIranian journal of public health · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Clostridium difficile infection in children: epidemiology and risk of recurrence in a low-prevalence country.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiuzhen DiCenter for Clinical Medicine/Medical Devices Trails, Translational Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Nan BaiCenter for Clinical Medicine/Medical Devices Trails, Translational Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bin LiuDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wentao NiDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jin WangCenter for Clinical Medicine/Medical Devices Trails, Translational Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kai WangCenter for Clinical Medicine/Medical Devices Trails, Translational Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Beibei LiangCenter for Clinical Medicine/Medical Devices Trails, Translational Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Youning LiuDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Rui WangCenter for Clinical Medicine/Medical Devices Trails, Translational Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: wangruivip301@sina.com.
Chinese People's Liberation Army · CNPeople's Liberation Army No. 150 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of metronidazole and vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, especially to investigate which agent was superior for treating either mild or severe C. difficile infection. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies identified in Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Four randomized controlled trials and two cohort studies involving 1218 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Metronidazole was inferior to vancomycin for treating C. difficile infection in terms of both initial clinical cure rates (risk ratio, RR=0.91, 95% confidence interval, CI=0.84-0.98, p=0.02) and sustained cure rates (RR=0.88, 95% CI=0.82-0.96, p=0.003). For mild C. difficile infection, the efficacy of metronidazole and vancomycin resulted in similar clinical cure rates (RR=0.94, 95% CI=0.84-1.04, p=0.21) and sustained cure rates (RR=0.93, 95% CI=0.83-1.05, p=0.26). For severe C. difficile infection the efficacy of vancomycin was superior to metronidazole in terms of clinical cure rates (RR=0.81, 95% CI=0.69-0.95, p=0.009), whereas sustained cure rates were similar (RR=0.86, 95% CI=0.72-1.02, p=0.08). Regarding microbiological cure metronidazole therapy was as effective as vancomycin therapy (RR=0.88, 95% CI=0.64-1.21, p=0.43). Recurrence rates with metronidazole and vancomycin for both mild C. difficile infection (RR=0.95, 95% CI=0.56-1.60, p=0.85) and severe C. difficile infection (RR=1.27, 95% CI=0.85-1.91, p=0.25) were not different. Likewise, no difference in all-cause mortality was found as well (RR=0.87, 95% CI=0.56-1.35, p=0.53). In conclusion, vancomycin provides improved initial clinical and sustained cure rates in patients with C. difficile infection compared with metronidazole, especially in patients with severe C. difficile infection. In view of these data, vancomycin may be considered first line therapy for severe C. difficile infection.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridium InfectionsCohort StudiesDiarrheaHumansMetronidazoleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsMetronidazoleVancomycinClostridium difficileClostridium difficile infection (CDI)MetronidazoleVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID26001980
PMCPMC9427463
OpenAlexW1935079435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.