Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26001813›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2016

Valuing the work of unpaid community health workers and exploring the incentives to volunteering in rural Africa.

Frida Kasteng, Stella Settumba, Karin Källander, Anna Vassall, inSCALE Study Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01972321 (Integrated Community Case Management of Common Childhood Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01972321 nacompletednot on this map

Integrated Community Case Management of Common Childhood Diseases: Mozambique and Uganda

TypeinterventionalSponsorMalaria ConsortiumRan2013 to 2015Enrolled2,289ConditionsMalaria, Pneumonia, DiarrhoeaArmsTechnology supported supervision, Community supported supervision, Integrated community case management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Quantifying and Valuing Community Health Worker Time in Improving Access to Malaria Diagnosis and Treatment.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frida KastengDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, London, UK, frida.kasteng@lshtm.ac.uk.
Stella SettumbaMalaria Consortium Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Karin KällanderMalaria Consortium, London, UK, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Health Systems and Policy group, Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda, and.
Anna VassallDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Social and Mathematical Epidemiology Group, London, UK.
inSCALE Study Group

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community health worker (CHW) programmes are currently being scaled-up in sub-Saharan Africa to improve access to healthcare. CHWs are often volunteers; from an economic perspective, this raises considerations whether reliance on an unpaid workforce is sustainable and how to appropriately cost and value the work of CHWs. Both these questions can be informed by an understanding of CHWs' workload, their opportunity costs of time and the perceived benefits of being a CHW. However, to date few studies have fully explored the methodological challenges in valuing CHW time. We examined the costs and benefits of volunteering in a sample of 45 CHWs providing integrated community case management of common childhood illnesses in rural Uganda in February 2012 using different methods. We assessed the value of CHW time using the minimum public sector salary rate and a CHW-elicited replacement wage, as well as the opportunity cost of time based on CHW-estimated annual income and alternative work opportunities, respectively. Reported monthly CHW workload, a median of 19.3 h (range 2.5-57), was valued at USD 6.9 (range 0.9-20.4) per month from the perspective of the healthcare system (applicable replacement wage) and at a median of USD 4.1 (range 0.4-169) from the perspective of the CHWs (individual opportunity cost of time). In a discrete choice experiment on preferred work characteristics, remuneration and community appreciation dominated. We find that volunteering CHWs value the opportunity to make a social contribution, but the decision to volunteer is also influenced by anticipated future rewards. Care must be taken by those costing and designing CHW programmes to acknowledge the opportunity cost of CHWs at the margin and over the long term. Failure to properly consider these issues may lead to cost estimations below the amount necessary to scale up and sustain programmes.

Indexed as

MotivationWorkloadAttitude of Health PersonnelCase ManagementCommunity Health WorkersCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansQualitative ResearchRemunerationRural Health ServicesUgandaVolunteersChild healthcommunity health workersintegrated community case managementopportunity costsUgandavolunteers

Identifiers

PMID26001813
PMCPMC4748129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.