Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26001704›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2015

Introduction of rapid syphilis testing in antenatal care: A systematic review of the impact on HIV and syphilis testing uptake and coverage.

Andrea Swartzendruber, Riley J Steiner, Michelle R Adler, Mary L Kamb, Lori M Newman

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. State-of-the-Art Review: Congenital Syphilis in the Modern Era: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea SwartzendruberRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: alswart@emory.edu.
Riley J SteinerRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Michelle R AdlerGlobal AIDS Program, Centers for Disease Control Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mary L KambDivision of STD Prevention, International Activities Unit, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lori M NewmanDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Parenting, Alcohol Use and Sexual Risk Among Young African-American MothersF32AA022058 · NIAAA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SWARTZENDRUBER, ANDREA · 2012 to 2014
$163k
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA022058World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal guidelines recommend universal syphilis and HIV screening for pregnant women. Rapid syphilis testing (RST) may contribute toward achievement of universal screening.

objectivesTo examine the impact of RST on syphilis and HIV screening among pregnant women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE for English- and non-English language articles published through November, 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that used a comparative design and reported on syphilis and HIV test uptake among pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) following introduction of RST. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted from six eligible articles presenting findings from Asia, Africa, and Latin America. MAIN

resultsAll studies reported substantial increases in antenatal syphilis testing following introduction of RST; the latter did not appear to adversely impact antenatal HIV screening levels at sites already offering rapid HIV testing and may increase HIV screening among pregnant women in some settings. Qualitative data revealed that women were highly satisfied with RST. Nevertheless, ensuring adequate training for healthcare workers and supplies of commodities were cited as key implementation barriers.

conclusionsRST may increase antenatal syphilis and HIV screening and contribute to the improvement of antenatal care in LMICs.

Indexed as

AdultAfricaAsiaDeveloping CountriesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalLatin AmericaMass ScreeningPatient SatisfactionPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal DiagnosisSyphilisSyphilis SerodiagnosisHIVPoint-of-care testPregnancyScreeningSyphilis

Identifiers

PMID26001704
PMCPMC6799988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.