ArticleJournal of digital imaging2015
DICOM for Clinical Research: PACS-Integrated Electronic Data Capture in Multi-Center Trials.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Functional Requirements for Medical Data Integration into Knowledge Management Environments: Requirements Elicitation Approach Based on Systematic Literature Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Data Quality Assurance in Cancer Imaging Repositories.Cancers · 2025Article
- Optimizing Pathological Examination Cost Control Through Process Management Information Systems: A Mixed-Methods Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Interoperable slide microscopy viewer and annotation tool for imaging data science and computational pathology.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- A Two-Stage De-Identification Process for Privacy-Preserving Medical Image Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Cloud-Ready Architecture for Shared Medical Imaging Repository.Journal of digital imaging · 2020Article
- A Good Practice-Compliant Clinical Trial Imaging Management System for Multicenter Clinical Trials: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART): Conceptual Considerations for the Informed Clinician.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2019Review
- Analysis of DICOM Image Compression Alternative Using Huffman Coding.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2019Article
- Development of a Smart Mobile Data Module for Fetal Monitoring in E-Healthcare.Journal of medical systems · 2018Article
- The Role of Free/Libre and Open Source Software in Learning Health Systems.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Article
- A Survey of DICOM Viewer Software to Integrate Clinical Research and Medical Imaging.Journal of digital imaging · 2016Article
- Neuroinformatics Software Applications Supporting Electronic Data Capture, Management, and Sharing for the Neuroimaging Community.Neuropsychology review · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing surrogate endpoints in clinical trials, medical imaging has become increasingly important in human-centered research. Nowadays, electronic data capture systems (EDCS) are used but binary image data is integrated insufficiently. There exists no structured way, neither to manage digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) data in EDCS nor to interconnect EDCS with picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). Manual detours in the trial workflow yield errors, delays, and costs. In this paper, requirements for a DICOM-based system interconnection of EDCS and research PACS are analysed. Several workflow architectures are compared. Optimized for multi-center trials, we propose an entirely web-based solution integrating EDCS, PACS, and DICOM viewer, which has been implemented using the open source projects OpenClinica, DCM4CHEE, and Weasis, respectively. The EDCS forms the primary access point. EDCS to PACS interchange is integrated seamlessly on the data and the context levels. DICOM data is viewed directly from the electronic case report form (eCRF), while PACS-based management is hidden from the user. Data privacy is ensured by automatic de-identification and re-labelling with study identifiers. Our concept is evaluated on a variety of 13 DICOM modalities and transfer syntaxes. We have implemented the system in an ongoing investigator-initiated trial (IIT), where five centers have recruited 24 patients so far, performing decentralized computed tomography (CT) screening. Using our system, the chief radiologist is reading DICOM data directly from the eCRF. Errors and workflow processing time are reduced. Furthermore, an imaging database is built that may support future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.