Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26001033›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesiology2015

Apnea after Awake Regional and General Anesthesia in Infants: The General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia Study--Comparing Apnea and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes, a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Andrew J Davidson, Neil S Morton, Sarah J Arnup, Jurgen C de Graaff, Nicola Disma, Davinia E Withington, Geoff Frawley, Rodney W Hunt, Pollyanna Hardy, Magda Khotcholava and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
35.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 282 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. General Anesthesia Maintained with Sevoflurane versus Propofol in Pediatric Surgery Shorter Than 1 Hour: A Randomized Single-Blind Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Effective and safe pediatric sedation.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J DavidsonFrom the Anaesthesia and Pain Management Research Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (A.J.D., G.F., G.O.); Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (A.J.D., G.F.); Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (A.J.D., G.F., R.W.H.); Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, Pain and Critical Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom (N.S.M.); Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, United Kingdom (N.S.M.); Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (S.J.A.); Department of Anaesthesia, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (J.C.d.G.); Department of Anesthesia, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy (N.D., P.T.); Department of Anaesthesia, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (D.E.W.); Department of Anesthesia, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (D.E.W.); Department of Neonatal Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (R.W.H.); Neonatal Research Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (R.W.H.); National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Clinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom (P.H.); Department of Anaesthesia, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.K., B.G.L.); Pharmacology, Pharmacy, Anaesthesiology Unit, School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (B.S.v.U.S.); Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (B.S.v.U.S.); Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia and Operating Rooms, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand (N.W.); Department of Anesthesiology and Paedi
Neil S Morton
Sarah J Arnup
Jurgen C de Graaff
Nicola Disma
Davinia E Withington
Geoff Frawley
Rodney W Hunt
Pollyanna Hardy
Magda Khotcholava
Britta S von Ungern Sternberg
Niall Wilton
Pietro Tuo
Ida Salvo
Gillian Ormond
Robyn Stargatt
Bruno Guido Locatelli
Mary Ellen McCann
General Anesthesia compared to Spinal anesthesia (GAS) Consortium
Murdoch Children's Research Institute · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

Effects of general vs. regional anesthesia on infant neurodevelopment and apneaR01HD061336 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BELLINGER, DAVID C, MCCANN, MARY ELLEN · 2010 to 2014
$2.3M
The GAS trial: neurocognitive outcomes 5 years after infant anesthesiaR01HD084566 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BELLINGER, DAVID C, MCCANN, MARY ELLEN · 2015 to 2017
$574k
CIHRDepartment of Health 07/01/05NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061336NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative apnea is a complication in young infants. Awake regional anesthesia (RA) may reduce the risk; however, the evidence is weak. The General Anesthesia compared to Spinal anesthesia study is a randomized, controlled trial designed to assess the influence of general anesthesia (GA) on neurodevelopment. A secondary aim is to compare rates of apnea after anesthesia.

methodsInfants aged 60 weeks or younger, postmenstrual age scheduled for inguinal herniorrhaphy, were randomized to RA or GA. Exclusion criteria included risk factors for adverse neurodevelopmental outcome and infants born less than 26 weeks gestation. The primary outcome of this analysis was any observed apnea up to 12 h postoperatively. Apnea assessment was unblinded.

resultsThree hundred sixty-three patients were assigned to RA and 359 to GA. Overall, the incidence of apnea (0 to 12 h) was similar between arms (3% in RA and 4% in GA arms; odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.30, P = 0.2133); however, the incidence of early apnea (0 to 30 min) was lower in the RA arm (1 vs. 3%; OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.91; P = 0.0367). The incidence of late apnea (30 min to 12 h) was 2% in both RA and GA arms (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.41 to 3.33; P = 0.7688). The strongest predictor of apnea was prematurity (OR, 21.87; 95% CI, 4.38 to 109.24), and 96% of infants with apnea were premature.

conclusionsRA in infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy reduces apnea in the early postoperative period. Cardiorespiratory monitoring should be used for all ex-premature infants.

Indexed as

WakefulnessAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, SpinalApneaChild DevelopmentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInternationalityMalePostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26001033
PMCPMC4626294
OpenAlexW1659673599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.