Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26000881›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Pan-phylum Comparison of Nematode Metabolic Potential.

Rahul Tyagi, Bruce A Rosa, Warren G Lewis, Makedonka Mitreva

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Parasitology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Multi-Omics Database for Parasitic Nematodes and Trematodes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul TyagiThe Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Bruce A RosaThe Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Warren G LewisDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Makedonka MitrevaThe Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America; Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America; Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

COMPARATIVE GENOMICS OF PARASITIC NEMATODESR01AI081803 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MITREVA, MAKEDONKA · 2009 to 2018
$3.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nematodes are among the most important causative pathogens of neglected tropical diseases. The increased availability of genomic and transcriptomic data for many understudied nematode species provides a great opportunity to investigate different aspects of their biology. Increasingly, metabolic potential of pathogens is recognized as a critical determinant governing their development, growth and pathogenicity. Comparing metabolic potential among species with distinct trophic ecologies can provide insights on overall biology or molecular adaptations. Furthermore, ascertaining gene expression at pathway level can help in understanding metabolic dynamics over development. Comparison of biochemical pathways (or subpathways, i.e. pathway modules) among related species can also retrospectively indicate potential mistakes in gene-calling and functional annotation. We show with numerous illustrative case studies that comparisons at the level of pathway modules have the potential to uncover biological insights while remaining computationally tractable. Here, we reconstruct and compare metabolic modules found in the deduced proteomes of 13 nematodes and 10 non-nematode species (including hosts of the parasitic nematode species). We observed that the metabolic potential is, in general, concomitant with phylogenetic and/or ecological similarity. Varied metabolic strategies are required among the nematodes, with only 8 out of 51 pathway modules being completely conserved. Enzyme comparison based on topology of metabolic modules uncovered diversification between parasite and host that can potentially guide therapeutic intervention. Gene expression data from 4 nematode species were used to study metabolic dynamics over their life cycles. We report unexpected differential metabolism between immature and mature microfilariae of the human filarial parasite Brugia malayi. A set of genes potentially important for parasitism is also reported, based on an analysis of gene expression in C. elegans and the human hookworm Necator americanus. We illustrate how analyzing and comparing metabolism at the level of pathway modules can improve existing knowledge of nematode metabolic potential and can provide parasitism related insights. Our reconstruction and comparison of nematode metabolic pathways at a pan-phylum and inter-phylum level enabled determination of phylogenetic restrictions and differential expression of pathways. A visualization of our results is available at http://nematode.net and the program for identification of module completeness (modDFS) is freely available at SourceForge. The methods reported will help biologists to predict biochemical potential of any organism with available deduced proteome, to direct experiments and test hypotheses.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrugia malayiCaenorhabditis elegansFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksGenome, HelminthHumansMaleMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomeMicrofilariaeNematodaNematode InfectionsPhylogenyProteomeSpecies SpecificityProteome

Identifiers

PMID26000881
PMCPMC4441503
OpenAlexW1724240554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.