Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26000445›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Downregulation of the Host Gene jigr1 by miR-92 Is Essential for Neuroblast Self-Renewal in Drosophila.

Yeliz Yuva-Aydemir, Xia-Lian Xu, Ozkan Aydemir, Eduardo Gascon, Serkan Sayin, Wenke Zhou, Yang Hong, Fen-Biao Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Characterisation of the role and regulation ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The multifaceted roles of microRNAs in differentiation.Current opinion in cell biology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. MicroRNA-92 Expression in CD133Cancer research · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yeliz Yuva-AydemirDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Xia-Lian XuGladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Ozkan AydemirDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Eduardo GasconDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Serkan SayinDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wenke ZhouDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Yang HongDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Fen-Biao GaoDepartment of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USGladstone Institutes · US

Funding

The MicroRNA Pathway in Translational Regulation of Neuronal DevelopmentR01NS066586 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GAO, FEN-BIAO · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Interactions between TDP-43 and microRNA-92 in Drosophila and human neuronsR21NS086318 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI GAO, FEN-BIAO · 2014 to 2015
$461k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS066586NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS086318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intragenic microRNAs (miRNAs), located mostly in the introns of protein-coding genes, are often co-expressed with their host mRNAs. However, their functional interaction in development is largely unknown. Here we show that in Drosophila, miR-92a and miR-92b are embedded in the intron and 3'UTR of jigr1, respectively, and co-expressed with some jigr1 isoforms. miR-92a and miR-92b are highly expressed in neuroblasts of larval brain where Jigr1 expression is low. Genetic deletion of both miR-92a and miR-92b demonstrates an essential cell-autonomous role for these miRNAs in maintaining neuroblast self-renewal through inhibiting premature differentiation. We also show that miR-92a and miR-92b directly target jigr1 in vivo and that some phenotypes due to the absence of these miRNAs are partially rescued by reducing the level of jigr1. These results reveal a novel function of the miR-92 family in Drosophila neuroblasts and provide another example that local negative feedback regulation of host genes by intragenic miRNAs is essential for animal development.

Indexed as

Down-Regulation3' Untranslated RegionsAnimalsBrainDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalLarvaMaleMicroRNAsNeural Stem CellsNeurogliaRNA, MessengerSequence Alignment3' Untranslated RegionsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsJigr1 protein, DrosophilaMicroRNAsMIRN92 microRNA, DrosophilaRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26000445
PMCPMC4441384
OpenAlexW298133138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.