ReviewAuto- immunity highlights2013
StreptInCor: a model of anti-Streptococcus pyogenes vaccine reviewed.
Review in Auto- immunity highlights, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Group A Streptococcal Virulence Factors and Vaccine Development-An Update.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Epitope-Based Vaccines: The Next Generation of Promising Vaccines Against Bacterial Infection.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Research opportunities for the primordial prevention of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease-streptococcal vaccine development: a national heart, lung and blood institute workshop report.BMJ global health · 2023Review
- Immunogenicity and Safety of a Chemically Synthesized Divalent Group A Streptococcal Vaccine.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Streptococcus pyogenes infections remain a health problem in multiple countries because of poststreptococcal sequelae, such as rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. The epidemiological growth of streptococcal diseases in undeveloped and developing countries has encouraged many groups to study vaccine candidates for preventing group A streptococcus infections. We developed a vaccine epitope (StreptInCor) composed of 55 amino acid residues of the C-terminal portion of the M protein that encompasses both T and B cell protective epitopes. Using human blood samples, we showed that the StreptInCor epitope is recognized by individuals bearing different HLA class II molecules and could be considered a universal vaccine epitope. In addition, the StreptInCor molecular structure was solved by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and a series of structural stability experiments was performed to elucidate its folding/unfolding mechanism. Using BALB-c and HLA class II transgenic mice, we evaluated the immune response over an extended period and found that StreptInCor was able to induce a robust immune response in both models. No cross-reaction was observed against cardiac proteins. The safety of the vaccine epitope was evaluated by analyzing histopathology, and no autoimmune or pathological reactions were observed in the heart or other organs. Vaccinated BALB/c mice challenged with a virulent strain of S. pyogenes had 100 % survival over 30 days. Taking all results into account, StreptInCor could be a safe and effective vaccine against streptococcus-induced disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.