Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25999796›Full record

ArticleClinical and molecular allergy : CMA2015

Pidotimod: the state of art.

Beatrice E Ferrario, Silvia Garuti, Fulvio Braido, Giorgio W Canonica

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and molecular allergy : CMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. From Legacy to Innovation: Pidotimod's Expanding Therapeutic Horizon.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  4. Pidotimod in pediatrics: new evidence and future perspectives.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Improving BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Tolerability without Efficacy Loss by Pidotimod Supplementation.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Immunostimulants in respiratory diseases: focus on Pidotimod.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Pidotimod: In-depth review of current evidence.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beatrice E Ferrario *Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, DIMI-Dept.Internal Medicine, University of Genova, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia Garuti *Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, DIMI-Dept.Internal Medicine, University of Genova, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Fulvio BraidoRespiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, DIMI-Dept.Internal Medicine, University of Genova, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Giorgio W CanonicaRespiratory Diseases and Allergy Clinic, DIMI-Dept.Internal Medicine, University of Genova, IRCCS AOU S.Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the use of antibiotics and vaccines, the frequency of respiratory tract infections is still high and these infections interest a wide range of patients, from children to aged people, including in particular these extreme categories because of the deficiency of their immune system, due to immaturity in the former case and to "immunosenescence" in the latter. For that reason immunostimulant drugs are getting more important to prevent and to attenuate infections. Pidotimod (3-L-pyroglutamyl-L-thiazolidine-4carboxylic acid) is a synthetic dipeptide with immunomodulatory properties. We reviewed studies conducted on different categories of patients, with particular attention on children and senile patients suffering from recurrent respiratory tract infections, associated, or not, with asthma or COPD. The outcomes considered are both clinical and laboratory parameters. The common end-point of these studies is that Pidotimod has an immunomodulatory activity which is able both to improve the clinical conditions of patients and to enhance and stimulate their immunity cells (lymphocytes but not only) functions acting on adaptive and innate immunity. Pidotimod is also able to increase the concentration of salivary IgA directed against bacteria; furthermore, it can modulate airway epithelial cells functions up-regulating the expression of toll-like receptors and acting on adhesion molecules. According to studies conducted on patients with atopic asthma, it seems that Pidotimod could affect T-lymphocytes balance with a possible addictional anti-allergic activity. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated an improvement of FEV1 and PEF in asthmatic patients treated with Pidotimod. Main clinical outcomes are the reduction of the number of infectious episodes, lesser severity of signs and symptoms and, consequently, a reduction in use of antibiotics and symptomatic drugs, less working and school days lost, less mortality and morbidity. The studies considered give positive results, confirming Pidotimod's efficacy. Furthermore, many studies show a good safety profile of the drug, without recording serious adverse events and mutagenic potential, and a very low incidence of side effects. Pidotimod is also a more safe solution in patients subjected to vaccination, if compared to lyophilized polibacterial, which can't be administered for thirty days before vaccination.

Indexed as

natural immunityPidotimod

Identifiers

PMID25999796
PMCPMC4440502
OpenAlexW2118859274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.