Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2015
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Intervention to Increase Participant Retention and Completed Home Visits in the Nurse-Family Partnership.
Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engagement in a Preventive Intervention for Preadolescent Children in Foster Care: Considerations for Intervention Design.Child psychiatry and human development · 2023Trial
- Engaging Families in Voluntary Prevention Services to Reduce Future Child Abuse and Neglect: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021Trial
- Effects of Home Visiting Program Implementation on Preventive Health Care Access and Utilization: Results from a Randomized Trial of Healthy Families Oregon.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020Trial
- A Qualitative Study of Mothers' Perspectives on Enrolling and Engaging in an Evidence-Based Nurse Home Visiting Program.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021Article
- Improving interagency service integration of the Australian Nurse Family Partnership Program for First Nations women and babies: a qualitative study.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Parent Involvement in Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs: an Integrative Review.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020Review
- Retaining participants in community-based health research: a case example on standardized planning and reporting.Trials · 2020Review
- Innovative Research Methods to Advance Precision in Home Visiting for More Efficient and Effective Programs.Child development perspectives · 2019Article
- What Influences Parental Engagement in Early Intervention? Parent, Program and Community Predictors of Enrolment, Retention and Involvement.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018Article
- Visit Attendance Patterns in Nurse-Family Partnership Community Sites.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018Article
- High school incompletion and childhood maltreatment among street-involved young people in Vancouver, Canada.Health & social care in the community · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We conducted a cluster-based randomized controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve participant retention in community replication sites of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP). We registered 26 sites and randomized them into three groups: retention intervention (RI, N = 9), delayed RI (DRI, N = 6), or control (C, NFP as usual, N = 11). The RI consisted of training nurses to give more explicit control over the frequency of visits and content of the program to the parent participants. Two of the sites assigned to the RI, two assigned to the DRI, and two out of four nurses in one other site assigned to the DRI chose not to participate in the intervention. Primary analyses (intention to treat) contrasted changes in participant retention and completed visits (the primary outcomes) in the two intervention groups (RI and DRI) compared to control sites, focusing on differences in performance among baseline cohorts compared to cohorts enrolled during the first year during which the retention intervention was implemented. Compared to baseline, retention declined in the control sites over time but stayed the same in the RI and DRI sites (p value for interaction = 0.099). Compared to baseline, the number of completed home visits declined over time in the control sites but did not in the RI and DRI sites, producing a significant treatment difference in change in mean completed home visits over time (2.71 visits, SE = 1.164, p = 0.020). The intervention offset a decline over time in retention and completed home visits found in the control group during the time covered by this trial. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the intervention indicated that improvements are needed to promote its uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.