Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25998921›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2015

Making policy practice in afterschool programs: a randomized controlled trial on physical activity changes.

Michael W Beets, R Glenn Weaver, Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy, Jennifer Huberty, Dianne S Ward, Russell R Pate, Darcy Freedman, Brent Hutto, Justin B Moore, Aaron Beighle

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Physical activity and sedentary time of youth in structured settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Development and Testing of an Out-of-School Hours Care Professional Development Program: A Pilot Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Awareness and use of the Eat Smart Play Smart resources in Out of School Hours Care services: A staff survey in New South Wales, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael W BeetsDepartment of Exercise Science. Electronic address: beets@mailbox.sc.edu.
R Glenn WeaverDepartment of Exercise Science.
Gabrielle Turner-McGrievyDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Jennifer HubertyDepartment of Exercise and Wellness, School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona.
Dianne S WardDepartment of Nutrition, School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Russell R PateDepartment of Exercise Science.
Darcy FreedmanJack, Joseph, and Morton Mandel School for Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Brent HuttoDepartment of Exercise Science.
Justin B MooreDepartment of Exercise Science; Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
Aaron BeighleDepartment of Kinesiology and Health Promotion, College of Education, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Funding

Physical Activity and Nutrition Intervention in Afterschool ProgramsR01HL112787 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BEETS, MICHAEL W · 2012 to 2015
$2.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS L40 HL120010NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL112787NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL112787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn the U.S., afterschool programs are asked to promote moderate to vigorous physical activity. One policy that has considerable public health importance is California's afterschool physical activity guidelines that indicate all children attending an afterschool program accumulate 30 minutes each day the program is operating. Few effective strategies exist for afterschool programs to meet this policy goal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a multistep adaptive intervention designed to assist afterschool programs in meeting the 30-minute/day moderate to vigorous physical activity policy goal.

designA 1-year group randomized controlled trial with baseline (spring 2013) and post-assessment (spring 2014). Data were analyzed 2014. SETTING/

participantsTwenty afterschool programs, serving >1,700 children (aged 6-12 years), randomized to either an intervention (n=10) or control (n=10) group.

interventionThe employed framework, Strategies To Enhance Practice, focused on intentional programming of physical activity opportunities in each afterschool program's daily schedule and included professional development training to establish core physical activity competencies of staff and afterschool program leaders with ongoing technical assistance.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was accelerometry-derived proportion of children meeting the 30-minute/day moderate to vigorous physical activity policy.

resultsChildren attending intervention afterschool programs had an OR of 2.37 (95% CI=1.58, 3.54) to achieve the physical activity policy at post-assessment compared to control afterschool programs. Sex-specific models indicated that the percentage of intervention girls and boys achieving the physical activity policy increased from 16.7% to 21.4% (OR=2.85, 95% CI=1.43, 5.68) and 34.2% to 41.6% (OR=2.26, 95% CI=1.35, 3.80), respectively. At post-assessment, six intervention afterschool programs increased the proportion of boys achieving the physical activity policy to ≥45% compared to one control afterschool program, whereas three intervention afterschool programs increased the proportion of girls achieving physical activity policy to ≥30% compared to no control afterschool programs.

conclusionsThe Strategies To Enhance Practice intervention can make meaningful changes in the proportion of children meeting the moderate to vigorous physical activity policy within one school year. Additional efforts are required to enhance the impact of the intervention.

Indexed as

ExercisePolicy MakingSchool Health ServicesAccelerometryCaliforniaChildFemaleHealth PolicyHealth PromotionHumansMaleProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID25998921
PMCPMC4441760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.