Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25998608›Full record

ReviewThe ocular surface2015

In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Cornea: New Developments in Image Acquisition, Reconstruction, and Analysis Using the HRT-Rostock Corneal Module.

W Matthew Petroll, Danielle M Robertson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ocular surface, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CornealFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ocular surface homeostasis instability in acoustic neuroma: corneal nerve density reduction and blink reflex abnormalities.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Monitoring the transition from corneal ulceration to healed scar using a Scheimpflug tomography-based densitometry.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  10. Diagnosis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyoglu eye journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Morphological characterization of the human corneal epithelium byQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Matthew PetrollDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: matthew.petroll@utsouthwestern.edu.
Danielle M RobertsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Assessment of Corneal Fibroblast Biomechanical BehaviorR01EY013322 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PETROLL, W MATTHEW · 2001 to 2025
$9.0M
Effects of Systemic Disease on Corneal Epithelial PathophysiologyR01EY024546 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI DANIELLE M. ROBERTSON · 2015 to 2026
$4.3M
Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY020799 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI NIEDERKORN, JERRY · 2010 to 2016
$4.1M
Interactive effects of OSA and T2DM on corneal and ocular surface diseaseR21EY024433 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROBERTSON, DANIELLE M. · 2014 to 2015
$433k
NEI NIH HHS EY024433NEI NIH HHS EY024546NEI NIH HHS P30 EY020799NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013322NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024546NEI NIH HHS R21 EY024433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optical sectioning ability of confocal microscopy allows high magnification images to be obtained from different depths within a thick tissue specimen and is thus ideally suited to the study of intact tissue in living subjects. In vivo confocal microscopy has been used in a variety of corneal research and clinical applications since its development over 25 years ago. In this article we review the latest developments in quantitative corneal imaging with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph with Rostock Corneal Module (HRT-RCM). We provide an overview of the unique strengths and weaknesses of the HRT-RCM. We discuss techniques for performing 3-D imaging with the HRT-RCM, including hardware and software modifications that allow full-thickness confocal microscopy through-focusing (CMTF) of the cornea, which can provide quantitative measurements of corneal sublayer thicknesses, stromal cell and extracellular matrix backscatter, and depth-dependent changes in corneal keratocyte density. We also review current approaches for quantitative imaging of the subbasal nerve plexus, which require a combination of advanced image acquisition and analysis procedures, including wide-field mapping and 3-D reconstruction of nerve structures. The development of new hardware, software, and acquisition techniques continues to expand the number of applications of the HRT-RCM for quantitative in vivo corneal imaging at the cellular level. Knowledge of these rapidly evolving strategies should benefit corneal clinicians and basic scientists alike.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalCorneaHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalReproducibility of Resultsconfocal microscopycorneaimage analysisin vivo imagingthree-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID25998608
PMCPMC4499020
OpenAlexW1938287210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.