Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25998320›Full record

ReviewJournal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners2016

Drug-drug interaction profile of components of a fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron: Review of clinical data.

James J Natale, Tulla Spinelli, Selma Calcagnile, Corinna Lanzarotti, Giorgia Rossi, David Cox, Kimia Kashef

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2016 Updated MASCC/ESMO Consensus Recommendations: Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Following High Emetic Risk Chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Midazolam: an essential palliative care drug.Palliative care and social practice · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James J NataleUPMC CancerCenter, Pittsburgh, PA, USA natalej@upmc.edu.
Tulla SpinelliHelsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland.
Selma CalcagnileHelsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland.
Corinna LanzarottiHelsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland.
Giorgia RossiHelsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland.
David CoxIpsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA (former employee of Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA).
Kimia KashefEisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
Helsinn (Switzerland) · CHEisai (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists (RAs) are commonly coadministered with serotonin (5-HT3) RAs (e.g. palonosetron (PALO)) to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting. Netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA), an oral fixed combination of netupitant (NETU)-a new NK1 RA-and PALO, is currently under development. In vitro data suggest that NETU inhibits CYP3A4 and is a substrate for and weak inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). This review evaluates potential drug-drug interactions between NETU or NEPA and CYP3A4 substrates/inducers/inhibitors or P-gp substrates in healthy subjects. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were evaluated for each drug when NETU was coadministered with PALO (single doses) and when single doses of NETU or NEPA were coadministered with CYP3A4 substrates (erythromycin (ERY), midazolam (MID), dexamethasone (DEX), or oral contraceptives), inhibitors (ketoconazole (KETO)), or inducers (rifampicin (RIF)), or a P-gp substrate (digoxin (DIG)). Results showed no relevant PK interactions between NETU and PALO. Coadministration of NETU increased MID and ERY exposure and significantly increased DEX exposure in a dose-dependent manner; NETU exposure was unaffected. NEPA coadministration had no clinically significant effect on oral contraception, although levonorgestrel exposure increased. NETU exposure increased after coadministration of NEPA with KETO and decreased after coadministration with RIF; PALO exposure was unaffected. NETU coadministration did not influence DIG exposure. In conclusion, there were no clinically relevant interactions between NETU and PALO, or NEPA and oral contraceptives (based on levonorgestrel and ethinylestradiol exposure). Coadministration of NETU or NEPA with CYP3A4 inducers/inhibitors/substrates should be done with caution. Dose reduction is recommended for DEX. Dose adjustments are not needed for NETU coadministration with P-gp substrates.

Indexed as

AnimalsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BBenzeneacetamidesDexamethasoneDrug CombinationsDrug InteractionsHumansIsoquinolinesNauseaPalonosetronPiperazinesPyridinesQuinuclidinesSerotonin AntagonistsVomitingABCB1 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BBenzeneacetamidesDexamethasoneDrug CombinationsIsoquinolinesnetupitantPalonosetronPiperazinesPyridinesQuinuclidinesSerotonin Antagonists5-HT3 receptor antagonistdrug interactionsNetupitantNK1 receptor antagonistpalonosetron

Identifiers

PMID25998320
PMCPMC4843089
OpenAlexW2144441186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.