Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25998180›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2015

MicroC(3): an ex vivo microfluidic cis-coculture assay to test chemosensitivity and resistance of patient multiple myeloma cells.

Chorom Pak, Natalie S Callander, Edmond W K Young, Benjamin Titz, KyungMann Kim, Sandeep Saha, Kenny Chng, Fotis Asimakopoulos, David J Beebe, Shigeki Miyamoto

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Toward improvedAPL bioengineering · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Addressing Patient Specificity in the Engineering of Tumor Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chorom PakMolecular and Cellular Pharmacology Graduate Program, Madison, WI, USA.
Natalie S Callander
Edmond W K Young
Benjamin Titz
KyungMann Kim
Sandeep Saha
Kenny Chng
Fotis Asimakopoulos
David J Beebe
Shigeki Miyamoto
Madison Group (United States) · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AMY TRENTHAM-DIETZ · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
Training in Cancer Biology Training GrantT32CA009135 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SUGDEN, WILLIAM M. · 1985 to 2024
$10.4M
Training Program In Molecular AND Cellular PharmacologyT32GM008688 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AUDHYA, ANJON · 1998 to 2020
$6.0M
Enabling NF-kB Signal Transduction Studies in Primary Multiple Myeloma CellsR01CA155192 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEEBE, DAVID J, MIYAMOTO, SHIGEKI · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155192NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009135NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemosensitivity and resistance assays (CSRAs) aim to direct therapies based upon ex vivo responses of patient tumor cells to chemotherapeutic drugs. However, successful CSRAs are yet to be developed. Here, we exposed primary CD138(+) multiple myeloma (MM) cells to bortezomib, a clinical proteasome inhibitor, in microfluidic-cis-coculture (MicroC(3)) incorporating the patient's own CD138(-) tumor-companion mononuclear cells to integrate some of the patients' own tumor microenvironment components in the CSRA design. Statistical clustering techniques segregated MicroC(3) responses into two groups which correctly identified all seventeen patients as either clinically responsive or non-responsive to bortezomib-containing therapies. In contrast, when the same patient MM samples were analyzed in the absence of the CD138(-) cells (monoculture), the tumor cell responses did not segregate into clinical response clusters. Thus, MicroC(3) identified bortezomib-therapy MM patient responses making it a viable CSRA candidate toward enabling personalized therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBortezomibCell Line, TumorCoculture TechniquesDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleHumansMaleMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaPrecision MedicineProtease InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsBortezomibProtease Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25998180
PMCPMC4476551
OpenAlexW2096553204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.