Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25998144›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2015

The contribution of sensory nerves to cutaneous vasodilatation of the forearm and leg to local skin heating.

Gary J Hodges, Andrew T Del Pozzi, Gregory W McGarr, Matthew M Mallette, Stephen S Cheung

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gary J HodgesEnvironmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada. ghodges@brocku.ca.
Andrew T Del PozziDepartment of Pediatrics, New York Medical College, Hawthorne, NY, 10532, USA.
Gregory W McGarrEnvironmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada.
Matthew M MalletteEnvironmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada.
Stephen S CheungEnvironmental Ergonomics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada.
Brock University · CANew York Medical College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe initial cutaneous vasodilatory response to local skin heating is larger in the forearm than the leg. While the initial vasodilatation of the forearm to local heating is primarily dependent on sensory nerves, their role in the leg is unknown. We compared the contribution of sensory nerves in driving the cutaneous vasodilatory response of the forearm and leg to local heating using local anaesthetic (EMLA) cream.

methodIn seven participants, two skin sites were selected on both the dorsal forearm and anterolateral calf; one site on each region received EMLA, with the other an untreated control. All sites were controlled at 33 °C and then locally heated to 42 °C with integrated laser-Doppler local heating probes.

resultsCutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) during the initial vasodilatation to local heating was smaller in the leg (47 ± 9% max) compared to the forearm (62 ± 7 % max) (P = 0.012). EMLA reduced the initial vasodilatation at both the leg (27 ± 13 % max) (P = 0.02) and forearm (33 ± 14% max) (P < 0.001). The times to onset of vasodilatation, initial vasodilatory peak, and plateau phase were longer in the leg compared to the forearm (all P < 0.05), and EMLA increased these times in both regions (both P < 0.05). CVC during the plateau phase to sustained local skin heating was higher in the leg compared to the forearm at both the untreated (93 ± 6 vs. 85 ± 4% max) (P = 0.33) and EMLA-treated (94 ± 5 vs. 86 ± 6% max) (P = 0.001) sites; EMLA did not affect CVC (P > 0.05).

conclusionThe differences in the initial vasodilatory peak to local skin heating between the forearm and the leg are due to the contribution of sensory nerves.

Indexed as

Skin TemperatureVasodilationAdultArmFemaleHot TemperatureHumansLegMaleRegional Blood FlowSensory Receptor CellsSkinEMLALaser DopplerLocal heatingSkin blood flow

Identifiers

PMID25998144
OpenAlexW316075505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.