ArticleMolecular medicine reports2015
Identification of genes associated with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma samples based on bioinformatic analysis.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Key Genes and Pathways in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Bioinformatics Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) samples and non‑neoplastic laryngeal squamous cell samples, and the underlying biological mechanism. Gene expression profile data of GSE51985 and GSE10288 were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. The DEGs between the LSCC and normal samples were identified using the rowtest function in the genefilter package. Hierarchical clustering for DEGs was performed to confirm the distinction between the identified DEGs, and Gene Ontology term and pathway enrichment analyses were performed to determine the underlying function of the DEGs. In addition, protein‑protein interaction networks were established to investigate the interactive mechanism of the DEGs. A total of 1,288 upregulated genes and 317 downregulated genes were identified between the LSCC samples and non‑neoplastic LSC samples in the GSE51985 dataset, and five upregulated and 26 downregulated genes were identified in the samples from the GSE10288 dataset. The DEGs were clearly distinguished between the LSCC sample and the non‑neoplastic LSCC sample by hierarchical clustering. The upregulated genes were predominantly involved in the cell cycle, cell division or focal adhesion, and the 295 upregulated genes formed 374 protein interaction pairs in interaction network analysis. The results revealed that the genes involved in the cell cycle, in cell division or in focal adhesion were associated with the development and progression of LSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.