ArticleScientific reports2015
Reliable Attention Network Scores and Mutually Inhibited Inter-network Relationships Revealed by Mixed Design and Non-orthogonal Method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthy or not? The impact of conflicting health-related information on attentional resources.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Trial
- Impact of teacher feedback on social working memory and associations with students' fear of evaluation in adolescents.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- HD-tDCS improves conflict processing and general behavioral stability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of functional connectivity changes in attention networks and default mode networks in patients with depression and insomnia.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- Understanding mental fatigue and its detection: a comparative analysis of assessments and tools.PeerJ · 2023Review
- Automaticity of Early Sexual Attention: An Event-Related Potential Study.Sexual abuse : a journal of research and treatment · 2022Article
- Alerting, Orienting, and Executive Control: The Effect of Bilingualism and Age on the Subcomponents of Attention.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Mind Wandering and Task-Focused Attention: ERP Correlates.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Automaticity of phasic alertness: Evidence for a three-component model of visual cueing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2016Article
- Low frequency steady-state brain responses modulate large scale functional networks in a frequency-specific means.Human brain mapping · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The attention system can be divided into alerting, orienting, and executive control networks. The efficiency and independence of attention networks have been widely tested with the attention network test (ANT) and its revised versions. However, many studies have failed to find effects of attention network scores (ANSs) and inter-network relationships (INRs). Moreover, the low reliability of ANSs can not meet the demands of theoretical and empirical investigations. Two methodological factors (the inter-trial influence in the event-related design and the inter-network interference in orthogonal contrast) may be responsible for the unreliability of ANT. In this study, we combined the mixed design and non-orthogonal method to explore ANSs and directional INRs. With a small number of trials, we obtained reliable and independent ANSs (split-half reliability of alerting: 0.684; orienting: 0.588; and executive control: 0.616), suggesting an individual and specific attention system. Furthermore, mutual inhibition was observed when two networks were operated simultaneously, indicating a differentiated but integrated attention system. Overall, the reliable and individual specific ANSs and mutually inhibited INRs provide novel insight into the understanding of the developmental, physiological and pathological mechanisms of attention networks, and can benefit future experimental and clinical investigations of attention using ANT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.