Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25996986›Full record

SynthesisPreventing chronic disease2015

Community-based restaurant interventions to promote healthy eating: a systematic review.

Jennifer N Valdivia Espino, Natalie Guerrero, Natalie Rhoads, Norma-Jean Simon, Anne L Escaron, Amy Meinen, F Javier Nieto, Ana P Martinez-Donate

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventing chronic disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. A Cluster Randomized Trial to Promote Healthy Menu Items for Children: The Kids' Choice Restaurant Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer N Valdivia EspinoUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Natalie GuerreroUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Natalie RhoadsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Norma-Jean SimonUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Anne L EscaronUniversity of California, Los Angeles, California.
Amy MeinenUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison and Wisconsin Obesity Prevention Network, Madison, Wisconsin.
F Javier NietoUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Ana P Martinez-Donate610 Walnut St, 605 WARF, Madison, WI 53705, Email: martinezdona@wisc.edu.

Funding

Training & Education to Advance Minorities in Science (TEAM-Science)R25GM083252 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BIRD, IAN M. · 2008 to 2021
$8.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM083252NIGMS NIH HHS R25GM083252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEating in restaurants is associated with high caloric intake. This review summarizes and evaluates the evidence supporting community-based restaurant interventions.

methodsWe searched all years of PubMed and Web of Knowledge through January 2014 for original articles describing or evaluating community-based restaurant interventions to promote healthy eating. We extracted summary information and classified the interventions into 9 categories according to the strategies implemented. A scoring system was adapted to evaluate the evidence, assigning 0 to 3 points to each intervention for study design, public awareness, and effectiveness. The average values were summed and then multiplied by 1 to 3 points, according to the volume of research available for each category. These summary scores were used to determine the level of evidence (insufficient, sufficient, or strong) supporting the effectiveness of each category.

resultsThis review included 27 interventions described in 25 studies published since 1979. Most interventions took place in exclusively urban areas of the United States, either in the West or the South. The most common intervention categories were the use of point-of-purchase information with promotion and communication (n = 6), and point-of-purchase information with increased availability of healthy choices (n = 6). Only the latter category had sufficient evidence. The remaining 8 categories had insufficient evidence because of interventions showing no, minimal, or mixed findings; limited reporting of awareness and effectiveness; low volume of research; or weak study designs. No intervention reported an average negative impact on outcomes.

conclusionEvidence about effective community-based strategies to promote healthy eating in restaurants is limited, especially for interventions in rural areas. To expand the evidence base, more studies should be conducted using robust study designs, standardized evaluation methods, and measures of sales, behavior, and health outcomes.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCommunity Health ServicesRestaurantsCommerceFeeding BehaviorFood SupplyHealth PromotionHumansUnited StatesUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID25996986
PMCPMC4454412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.