ReviewJournal of psychosocial oncology2015
Psychological Counseling of Female Fertility Preservation Patients.
Review in Journal of psychosocial oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Fertility preservation and mental health among cancer patients of reproductive age.Fertility and sterility · 2025Review
- Advances in fertility preservation and pregnancy care for transplant patients.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Exploring the Fertility Needs of Women Before and After Oocyte Freezing for Medical and Non-Medical Reasons: A Scoping Review.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Caring for Pregnant Patients with Cancer: A Framework for Ethical and Patient-Centred Care.Cancers · 2024Review
- Filling the Gaps in Oncofertility Care by Addressing Challenges Faced by Patients and Providers.Cureus · 2023Review
- Reproduction in life and death: should cancer patients with a poor prognosis be offered fertility preservation interventions?Reproduction & fertility · 2023Article
- "Queer Insights": Considerations and Challenges for Assessing Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation in Oncofertility Research.Annals of LGBTQ public and population health · 2022Article
- Factors Associated With a High Motivation to Undergo Fertility Preservation in Female Cancer Patients.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Considering race in the administration of fertility preservation. A commentary on: "Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in a major American city".Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Advances in the Treatment and Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Ovarian stimulation is a safe and effective fertility preservation option in the adolescent and young adult population.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Supportive oncofertility care, psychological health and reproductive concerns: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
- Fertility preservation in women affected by gynaecological cancer: the importance of an integrated gynaecological and psychological approach.Ecancermedicalscience · 2020Review
- Survey of Third-Party Parenting Options Associated With Fertility Preservation Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
- Comparing fertility preservation resources and policies between NCCN member and non-member institutions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019Article
- Development of a Pediatric Fertility Preservation Program: A Report From the Pediatric Initiative Network of the Oncofertility Consortium.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019Review
- How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care.Human reproduction update · 2019Article
- Review
- Fertility preservation in gynaecologic cancers.Ecancermedicalscience · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Young cancer patients are increasingly interested in preserving their fertility prior to undergoing gonadotoxic therapies. Although the medical safety and treatment protocols for fertility preservation have been well documented, limited research has addressed the emotional issues that arise in fertility preservation patients. We briefly review the literature on the psychosocial issues in adult female fertility preservation treatment and describe our experiences within this patient population. Our findings suggest that several important issues to be addressed during the psychological counseling of adult female fertility preservation patients include: (1) preexisting psychological distress in patients undergoing treatment, (2) choice of fertility preservation strategy in the face of an uncertain relationship future, (3) decision making regarding use of third-party reproduction (e.g., sperm/egg donation, gestational surrogacy), (4) treatment expectations regarding pregnancy and miscarriage, (5) ethical issues related to treatment including the creation, cryopreservation, and disposition of embryos/oocytes, and (6) decision regret from patients who declined fertility preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.