Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25996451›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2015

Ontario's emergency department process improvement program: the experience of implementation.

Leahora Rotteau, Fiona Webster, Erin Salkeld, Chelsea Hellings, Astrid Guttmann, Marian J Vermeulen, Robert S Bell, Merrick Zwarenstein, Brian H Rowe, Amit Nigam and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Methodological Approaches to Support Process Improvement in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leahora RotteauThe Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fiona WebsterThe Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erin SalkeldThe Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Chelsea HellingsThe Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Astrid GuttmannThe Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marian J VermeulenThe Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robert S BellThe Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Merrick ZwarensteinThe Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Brian H RoweThe Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Amit NigamCass Business School, City University, London, UK.
Michael J SchullThe Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
ED Investigator Team

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn recent years, Lean manufacturing principles have been applied to health care quality improvement efforts to improve wait times. In Ontario, an emergency department (ED) process improvement program based on Lean principles was introduced by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care as part of a strategy to reduce ED length of stay (LOS) and to improve patient flow. This article aims to describe the hospital-based teams' experiences during the ED process improvement program implementation and the teams' perceptions of the key factors that influenced the program's success or failure.

methodsA qualitative evaluation was conducted based on semistructured interviews with hospital implementation team members, such as team leads, medical leads, and executive sponsors, at 10 purposively selected hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Sites were selected based, in part, on their changes in median ED LOS following the implementation period. A thematic framework approach as used for interviews, and a standard thematic coding framework was developed.

resultsTwenty-four interviews were coded and analyzed. The results are organized according to participants' experience and are grouped into four themes that were identified as significantly affecting the implementation experience: local contextual factors, relationship between improvement team and support players, staff engagement, and success and sustainability. The results demonstrate the importance of the context of implementation, establishing strong relationships and communication strategies, and preparing for implementation and sustainability prior to the start of the project.

conclusionsSeveral key factors were identified as important to the success of the program, such as preparing for implementation, ensuring strong executive support, creation of implementation teams based on the tasks and outcomes of the initiative, and using multiple communication strategies throughout the implementation process. Explicit incorporation of these factors into the development and implementation of future similar interventions in health care settings could be useful.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalEmergency Service, HospitalHumansInterviews as TopicLength of StayOntarioPersonnel, HospitalQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID25996451
PMCPMC5032978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.