Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25996390›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Biodistribution and Toxicity Studies of PRINT Hydrogel Nanoparticles in Mosquito Larvae and Cells.

Yashdeep Phanse, Brendan M Dunphy, Jillian L Perry, Paul M Airs, Cynthia C H Paquette, Jonathan O Carlson, Jing Xu, J Christopher Luft, Joseph M DeSimone, Barry J Beaty and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Nano-enabled delivery of diverse payloads across complex biological barriers.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yashdeep PhanseDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Brendan M DunphyDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Jillian L PerryLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Paul M AirsDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Cynthia C H PaquetteDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Jonathan O CarlsonDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Jing XuLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
J Christopher LuftLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Joseph M DeSimoneLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Institute for Nanomedicine and Institute for Advanced Materials, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America; Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Barry J BeatyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Lyric C BartholomayDepartment of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases continue to remain major threats to human and animal health and impediments to socioeconomic development. Increasing mosquito resistance to chemical insecticides is a great public health concern, and new strategies/technologies are necessary to develop the next-generation of vector control tools. We propose to develop a novel method for mosquito control that employs nanoparticles (NPs) as a platform for delivery of mosquitocidal dsRNA molecules to silence mosquito genes and cause vector lethality. Identifying optimal NP chemistry and morphology is imperative for efficient mosquitocide delivery. Toward this end, fluorescently labeled polyethylene glycol NPs of specific sizes, shapes (80 nm x 320 nm, 80 nm x 5000 nm, 200 nm x 200 nm, and 1000 nm x 1000 nm) and charges (negative and positive) were fabricated by Particle Replication in Non-Wetting Templates (PRINT) technology. Biodistribution, persistence, and toxicity of PRINT NPs were evaluated in vitro in mosquito cell culture and in vivo in Anopheles gambiae larvae following parenteral and oral challenge. Following parenteral challenge, the biodistribution of the positively and negatively charged NPs of each size and shape was similar; intense fluorescence was observed in thoracic and abdominal regions of the larval body. Positively charged NPs were more associated with the gastric caeca in the gastrointestinal tract. Negatively charged NPs persisted through metamorphosis and were observed in head, body and ovaries of adults. Following oral challenge, NPs were detected in the larval mid- and hindgut. Positively charged NPs were more efficiently internalized in vitro than negatively charged NPs. Positively charged NPs trafficked to the cytosol, but negatively charged NPs co-localized with lysosomes. Following in vitro and in vivo challenge, none of the NPs tested induced any cytotoxic effects.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesBiological TransportDrug CarriersHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateInsecticidesLarvaMosquito ControlNanoparticlesPolyethylene GlycolsRNA InterferenceRNA, Small InterferingDrug CarriersHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateInsecticidesPolyethylene GlycolsRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID25996390
PMCPMC4440723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.