ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
The opponent channel population code of sound location is an efficient representation of natural binaural sounds.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Distinct Neuron Types Contribute to Hybrid Auditory Spatial Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Barn owls specialized sound-driven behavior: Lessons in optimal processing and coding by the auditory system.Hearing research · 2024Review
- Ecological origins of perceptual grouping principles in the auditory system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Synthesis of Hemispheric ITD Tuning from the Readout of a Neural Map: Commonalities of Proposed Coding Schemes in Birds and Mammals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019Article
- Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019Review
- Cooperative population coding facilitates efficient sound-source separability by adaptation to input statistics.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- On the Sparse Structure of Natural Sounds and Natural Images: Similarities, Differences, and Implications for Neural Coding.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Efficient Neural Coding in Auditory and Speech Perception.Trends in neurosciences · 2019Review
- Adaptive coding for dynamic sensory inference.eLife · 2018Article
- Widespread and Opponent fMRI Signals Represent Sound Location in Macaque Auditory Cortex.Neuron · 2017Article
- Opponent Coding of Sound Location (Azimuth) in Planum Temporale is Robust to Sound-Level Variations.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2016Article
- Correction: The Opponent Channel Population Code of Sound Location Is an Efficient Representation of Natural Binaural Sounds.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mammalian auditory cortex, sound source position is represented by a population of broadly tuned neurons whose firing is modulated by sounds located at all positions surrounding the animal. Peaks of their tuning curves are concentrated at lateral position, while their slopes are steepest at the interaural midline, allowing for the maximum localization accuracy in that area. These experimental observations contradict initial assumptions that the auditory space is represented as a topographic cortical map. It has been suggested that a "panoramic" code has evolved to match specific demands of the sound localization task. This work provides evidence suggesting that properties of spatial auditory neurons identified experimentally follow from a general design principle- learning a sparse, efficient representation of natural stimuli. Natural binaural sounds were recorded and served as input to a hierarchical sparse-coding model. In the first layer, left and right ear sounds were separately encoded by a population of complex-valued basis functions which separated phase and amplitude. Both parameters are known to carry information relevant for spatial hearing. Monaural input converged in the second layer, which learned a joint representation of amplitude and interaural phase difference. Spatial selectivity of each second-layer unit was measured by exposing the model to natural sound sources recorded at different positions. Obtained tuning curves match well tuning characteristics of neurons in the mammalian auditory cortex. This study connects neuronal coding of the auditory space with natural stimulus statistics and generates new experimental predictions. Moreover, results presented here suggest that cortical regions with seemingly different functions may implement the same computational strategy-efficient coding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.