ReviewThe Analyst2015
Mass spectrometry tools and workflows for revealing microbial chemistry.
Review in The Analyst, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time monitoring of metabolic plasticity in Mycoplasma gallisepticum under varying nutrient conditions via DART-HRMS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Snapshot, Using a Multi-Omic Approach, of the Metabolic Cross-Talk and the Dynamics of the Resident Microbiota in Ripening Cheese Inoculated withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Metabolomics Based Approaches.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Metabolomic Characterization of a cf.Marine drugs · 2021Article
- Mass Spectrometry: A Rosetta Stone to Learn How Fungi Interact and Talk.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Staring into the void: demystifying microbial metabolomics.FEMS microbiology letters · 2019Article
- Natural products chemistry: The emerging trends and prospective goals.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2018Article
- Identification of small molecules using accurate mass MS/MS search.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2018Review
- Bacillus Classification Based on Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry-Effects of Culture Conditions.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
- Recent Advances in Understanding and Engineering Polyketide Synthesis.F1000Research · 2016Review
- Predominately Uncultured Microbes as Sources of Bioactive Agents.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Review
- Natural products from microbes associated with insects.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since the time Van Leeuwenhoek was able to observe microbes through a microscope, an innovation that led to the birth of the field of microbiology, we have aimed to understand how microorganisms function, interact and communicate. The exciting progress in the development of analytical technologies and workflows has demonstrated that mass spectrometry is a very powerful technique for the interrogation of microbiology at the molecular level. In this review, we aim to highlight the available and emerging tools in mass spectrometry for microbial analysis by overviewing the methods and workflow advances for taxonomic identification, microbial interaction, dereplication and drug discovery. We emphasize their potential for future development and point out unsolved problems and future directions that would aid in the analysis of the chemistry produced by microbes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.