Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995984›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

Women with large (≥3 cm) and locally advanced breast cancers (T3, 4, N1, 2, M0) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, docetaxel): addition of capecitabine improves 4-year disease-free survival.

Jennifer Eremin, Ged Cowley, Leslie G Walker, Elisabeth Murray, Monika Stovickova, Oleg Eremin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer EreminResearch & Development Department, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, LN2 5QY UK ; Lincoln Breast Unit, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, UK.
Ged CowleyDepartment of Pathology, PathLinks, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, UK.
Leslie G WalkerMedical Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Elisabeth MurrayLincoln Breast Unit, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, UK ; Department of Oncology, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, UK.
Monika StovickovaDepartment of Radiology, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, UK.
Oleg EreminResearch & Development Department, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, LN2 5QY UK ; Lincoln Breast Unit, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, UK ; Division of Surgery, The University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham, UK.
Lincoln County Hospital · GBUniversity of Hull · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether capecitabine (X), combined with docetaxel (T) following doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C), enhanced the pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast and axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) of women with large or locally advanced breast cancers (LLABCs) improving outcome, and the effect on quality of life (QoL). PATIENTS AND

methods117 women were enrolled, 112 randomised to 2 cycles of AC (60 mg/m(2), 600 mg/m(2)) given 3 weekly. Tumour responses were assessed by magnetic resonance mammography. Responders (n = 77) received 2 further cycles of AC and were randomised to 4 cycles of T (100 mg/m(2)) (Group A) or T (75 mg/m(2)) and X (2000 mg/m(2)/day), day one to 14 of each 3 weekly cycle (Group B). Non-responders (n = 35) were randomised to 6 cycles of T (Group C) or T + X (Group D). QoL questionnaires were completed at each chemotherapy visit. Pathological responses were evaluated using established criteria.

resultsThe groups were comparable in patient and tumour characteristics (79.5% T2, 85.7% ductal, 73.2% ER +ve, 22.3% HER2 +ve, 42% involved ALNs). Overall breast pCR was 27.1%, Groups A + C versus B + D (p = 0.446). ALN +ve pCR was 41.9%, Groups A + C versus B + D (p = 0.231). 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly improved with X (p = 0.016) but not overall survival (p = 0.056). Triple -ve and HER2 +ve tumours, and persistent ALN disease were risk factors for metastases. X increased severe nail changes (p = 0.0002) and hand-foot syndrome (p = 0.014) without affecting QoL.

conclusionNAC-X did not increase breast and ALN pCR but improved 4-year DFS, without detriment to QoL.

Indexed as

Breast cancerNeoadjuvant chemotherapyResponseSurvival

Identifiers

PMID25995984
PMCPMC4429427
OpenAlexW1578705947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.