Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995721›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2015

Validity and reproducibility of a revised semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQFFQ) for women of age-group 12-44 years in Chengdu.

Ying Tang, Ying Liu, Liangzhi Xu, Yujian Jia, Dan Shan, Wenjuan Li, Xin Pan, Deying Kang, Chengyu Huang, Xiaosong Li and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A meta-analysis of the reproducibility of food frequency questionnaires in nutritional epidemiological studies.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ying TangDepartment of Ultrasonography, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Liangzhi XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Yujian JiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Dan ShanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Wenjuan LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Xin PanMother and Baby Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia.
Deying KangDepartment of Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China.
Chengyu HuangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, Sichuan University, China.
Xiaosong LiWest China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Ultrasonography, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Ying HuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Lingli KonglinDepartment of Ultrasonography, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Jing ZhuangDepartment of Ultrasonography, West China Women's and Children's Hospital of Sichuan University, China.
Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital · CNSichuan University · CNCenter for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition · USUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To find a credible nutritional screening tool for evaluating relationship between nutritional status and diseases in Chengdu female residents, the reliability and validity of a revised semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SQFFQ) were tested. The validity was assessed by comparing the SQFFQ with the 'standard' method of 3 days' dietary recall, and the reliability was assessed by comparing the first SQFFQ with the second SQFFQ at 4 weeks interval. Correlation analysis showed that, for reliability, the average correlation coefficient (CC) of 22 kinds of nutrients was 0.66 and reduced to 0.60 after adjusting for energy; the average of intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) was 0.65. For validity, the average CC was 0.35 and remained stable after adjusting for CC of energy or nutrients. Validity of 17 nutrients in SQFFQ survey had correlation with result of 3 days' dietary recall. The results showed that the revised SQFFQ can be used for investigating the role of nutrients in development of disease in Chengdu female residents.

Indexed as

Diet SurveysFeeding BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultChinaFemaleNutrition assessmentReliabilitySemi-quantitative food frequency questionnaireValidity

Identifiers

PMID25995721
PMCPMC4438648
OpenAlexW1826099438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.