Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995658›Full record

ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2015

Hard tissue regeneration using bone substitutes: an update on innovations in materials.

Swapan Kumar Sarkar, Byong Taek Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Treated dentin matrix enhances proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Swapan Kumar SarkarInstitute of Tissue Regeneration, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
Byong Taek LeeInstitute of Tissue Regeneration, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea. ; Institute of Tissue Regeneration, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone is a unique organ composed of mineralized hard tissue, unlike any other body part. The unique manner in which bone can constantly undergo self-remodeling has created interesting clinical approaches to the healing of damaged bone. Healing of large bone defects is achieved using implant materials that gradually integrate with the body after healing is completed. Such strategies require a multidisciplinary approach by material scientists, biological scientists, and clinicians. Development of materials for bone healing and exploration of the interactions thereof with the body are active research areas. In this review, we explore ongoing developments in the creation of materials for regenerating hard tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesCeramicsDiffusion of InnovationFracture HealingHumansHydrogelsPolymersRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringTreatment OutcomeBone SubstitutesHydrogelsPolymersBioceramicsBiopolymersBone substitutesBone tissue engineeringHydrogel

Identifiers

PMID25995658
PMCPMC4438282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.