Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995468›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Enhanced procedural learning of speech sound categories in a genetic variant of FOXP2.

Bharath Chandrasekaran, Han-Gyol Yi, Nathaniel J Blanco, John E McGeary, W Todd Maddox

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. LinkedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The nature of non-native speech sound representations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022
    Review
  4. Non-sensory Influences on Auditory Learning and Plasticity.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Review
  5. Learning nonnative speech sounds changes local encoding in the adult human cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Toward Robust Functional Neuroimaging Genetics of Cognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Association Between Genetic Variation inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Performance Pressure Enhances Speech Learning.Applied psycholinguistics · 2016
    Article
  16. Resting-state low-frequency fluctuations reflect individual differences in spoken language learning.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2016
    Article
  17. The role of age and executive function in auditory category learning.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bharath ChandrasekaranDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Department of Psychology, Department of Linguistics, Institute for Neuroscience, Institute for Mental Health Research, and bchandra@utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3673-9435
Han-Gyol YiDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Department of Psychology.
Nathaniel J BlancoDepartment of Psychology.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9899-8048
John E McGearyProvidence Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, and Division of Behavioral Genetics, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island 02903.
W Todd MaddoxDepartment of Psychology, Institute for Neuroscience, Institute for Mental Health Research, and Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712.
Institute of Psychology · RUCenter for Applied Linguistics · USCentre for Movement Disorders · CAProvidence College · US

Funding

Supplement to cortical contributions to frequency-following response generation and modulationR01DC013315 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ABEL, TAYLOR JOHN, CHANDRASEKARAN, BHARATH · 2014 to 2025
$5.5M
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment LearningR01DA032457 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BEEVERS, CHRISTOPHER G · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS DA032457NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032457NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013315NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC013315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mutation of the forkhead box protein P2 (FOXP2) gene is associated with severe deficits in human speech and language acquisition. In rodents, the humanized form of FOXP2 promotes faster switching from declarative to procedural learning strategies when the two learning systems compete. Here, we examined a polymorphism of FOXP2 (rs6980093) in humans (214 adults; 111 females) for associations with non-native speech category learning success. Neurocomputational modeling results showed that individuals with the GG genotype shifted faster to procedural learning strategies, which are optimal for the task. These findings support an adaptive role for the FOXP2 gene in modulating the function of neural learning systems that have a direct bearing on human speech category learning.

Indexed as

LearningModels, NeurologicalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdolescentAdultFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansMaleSpeech PerceptionForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP2 protein, humancategory learningcorticostriatal systemsFOXP2genetic variationprocedural learningspeech

Identifiers

PMID25995468
PMCPMC4438127
OpenAlexW1494441336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.