Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995351›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Ambient illumination switches contrast preference of specific retinal processing streams.

James T Pearson, Daniel Kerschensteiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Natural motion statistics unify direction computations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Altered Functional Responses of the Retina in B6 Albino Tyrc/c Mice.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AMIGO1 Promotes Axon Growth and Territory Matching in the Retina.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James T PearsonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Graduate Program in Developmental, Regenerative and Stem Cell Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;
Daniel KerschensteinerDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Hope Center for Neurological Disorders at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri dkerschensteiner@wustl.edu.

Funding

Research Training Program in the Vision SciencesT32EY013360 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHIMING CHEN, Daniel Kerschensteiner · 2000 to 2026
$5.6M
Neuronal plasticity in retinal circuit development and diseaseR01EY023341 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KERSCHENSTEINER, DANIEL · 2014 to 2022
$2.8M
SPATIAL CELL BIOLOGY OF RETINAL CIRCUIT DEVELOPMENTR01EY021855 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KERSCHENSTEINER, DANIEL · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021855NEI NIH HHS R01-EY-021855NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023341NEI NIH HHS R01-EY-023341NEI NIH HHS T32 EY013360NEI NIH HHS T32-EY-013360-13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast, a fundamental feature of visual scenes, is encoded in a distributed manner by ∼ 20 retinal ganglion cell (RGC) types, which stream visual information to the brain. RGC types respond preferentially to positive (ON(pref)) or negative (OFF(pref)) contrast and differ in their sensitivity to preferred contrast and responsiveness to nonpreferred stimuli. Vision operates over an enormous range of mean light levels. The influence of ambient illumination on contrast encoding across RGC types is not well understood. Here, we used large-scale multielectrode array recordings to characterize responses of mouse RGCs under lighting conditions spanning five orders in brightness magnitude. We identify three functional RGC types that switch contrast preference in a luminance-dependent manner (Sw1-, Sw2-, and Sw3-RGCs). As ambient illumination increases, Sw1- and Sw2-RGCs shift from ON(pref) to OFF(pref) and Sw3-RGCs from OFF(pref) to ON(pref). In all cases, transitions in contrast preference are reversible and track light levels. By mapping spatiotemporal receptive fields at different mean light levels, we find that changes in input from ON and OFF pathways in receptive field centers underlie shifts in contrast preference. Sw2-RGCs exhibit direction-selective responses to motion stimuli. Despite changing contrast preference, direction selectivity of Sw2-RGCs and other RGCs as well as orientation-selective responses of RGCs remain stable across light levels.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsFemaleMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMicroelectrodesPhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsTissue Culture TechniquesVision, OcularVisual Pathwaysambient illuminationcontrast encodingmultielectrode arrayretinaswitch circuit

Identifiers

PMID25995351
PMCPMC4509391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.