Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995259›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2015

Inhibitory Effect of Individual or Combinations of Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies and Antiviral Reagents against Cell-Free and Cell-to-Cell HIV-1 Transmission.

Randi B Gombos, Dror Kolodkin-Gal, Leila Eslamizar, Joshua O Owuor, Emanuele Mazzola, Ana M Gonzalez, Birgit Korioth-Schmitz, Rebecca S Gelman, David C Montefiori, Barton F Haynes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nonlytic Egress and Transmission in the Virus World.Annual review of biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Role of MSCs and Cell Fusion in Tissue Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Development of a NovelJournal of virology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Randi B GombosBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA rgombos@outlook.com.
Dror Kolodkin-GalBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Leila EslamizarBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joshua O OwuorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Emanuele MazzolaDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ana M GonzalezBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Birgit Korioth-SchmitzBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rebecca S GelmanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David C MontefioriHuman Vaccine Institute and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Barton F HaynesHuman Vaccine Institute and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Joern E SchmitzBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Virus biology scientific research support componentUM1AI100645 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCMICHAEL, ANDREW JAMES · 2012 to 2018
$204.7M
The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ROBERT A. PARKER · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI060354NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI100645NIAID NIH HHS UM1-AI100645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledTo date, most therapeutic and vaccine candidates for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) are evaluated preclinically for efficacy against cell-free viral challenges. However, cell-associated HIV-1 is suggested to be a major contributor to sexual transmission by mucosal routes. To determine if neutralizing antibodies or inhibitors block cell-free and cell-associated virus transmission of diverse HIV-1 strains with different efficiencies, we tested 12 different antibodies and five inhibitors against four green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled HIV-1 envelope (Env) variants from transmitted/founder (T/F) or chronic infection isolates. We evaluated antibody/inhibitor-mediated virus neutralization using either TZM-bl target cells, in which infectivity was determined by virus-driven luciferase expression, or A3R5 lymphoblastoid target cells, in which infectivity was evaluated by GFP expression. In both the TZM-bl and A3R5 assays, cell-free virus or infected CD4+ lymphocytes were used as targets for neutralization. We further hypothesized that the combined use of specific neutralizing antibodies targeting HIV-1 Env would more effectively prevent cell-associated virus transmission than the use of individual antibodies. The tested antibody combinations included two gp120-directed antibodies, VRC01 and PG9, or VRC01 with the gp41-directed antibody 10E8. Our results demonstrated that cell-associated virus was less sensitive to neutralizing antibodies and inhibitors, particularly using the A3R5 neutralization assay, and the potencies of these neutralizing agents differed among Env variants. A combination of different neutralizing antibodies that target specific sites on gp120 led to a significant reduction in cell-associated virus transmission. These assays will help identify ideal combinations of broadly neutralizing antibodies to use for passive preventive antibody administration and further characterize targets for the most effective neutralizing antibodies/inhibitors. IMPORTANCE: Prevention of the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) remains a prominent goal of HIV research. The relative contribution of HIV-1 within an infected cell versus cell-free HIV-1 to virus transmission remains debated. It has been suggested that cell-associated virus is more efficient at transmitting HIV-1 and more difficult to neutralize than cell-free virus. Several broadly neutralizing antibodies and retroviral inhibitors are currently being studied as potential therapies against HIV-1 transmission. The present study demonstrates a decrease in neutralizing antibody and inhibitor efficiencies against cell-associated compared to cell-free HIV-1 transmission among different strains of HIV-1. We also observed a significant reduction in virus transmission using a combination of two different neutralizing antibodies that target specific sites on the outermost region of HIV-1, the virus envelope. Therefore, our findings support the use of antibody combinations against both cell-free and cell-associated virus in future candidate therapy regimens.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntiviral AgentsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansAntibodies, NeutralizingAntiviral AgentsHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID25995259
PMCPMC4505680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.