Trial reportBMJ open2015
Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led internet-based vascular risk factor management programme: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00785031 (Internet-based Vascular Risk Factor Management for Patients With Clinical Manifest Vascular Disease; a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Internet-based Vascular Risk Factor Management for Patients With Clinical Manifest Vascular Disease; a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nurse-led remote digital support for adults with chronic conditions: A systematic synthesis without meta-analysis.Journal of clinical nursing · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of telemedicine on secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Outcomes of nurse practitioner-led care in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2020Pooled it
- Changing the Health Behavior of Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Through an Electronic Health Intervention in Three Different Countries: Cost-Effectiveness Study in the Do Cardiac Health: Advanced New Generation Ecosystem (Do CHANGE) 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- The effectiveness of eHealth-based cardiovascular disease risk communication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Economic Evaluation Methodologies of Remote Patient Monitoring for Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Bottom-Up Analysis of Telemonitoring Costs: A Case Study in Slovenian Primary Care.Zdravstveno varstvo · 2024Article
- Economic evaluation of remote patient monitoring and organizational analysis according to patient involvement: a scoping review.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Article
- Telemedicine and Digital Health Applications in Vascular Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Determining if Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the cost-effectiveness of an internet-based, nurse-led vascular risk factor management programme in addition to usual care compared with usual care alone in patients with a clinical manifestation of a vascular disease.
designCost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial (the Internet-based vascular Risk factor Intervention and Self-management (IRIS) study).
settingMulticentre trial in a secondary and tertiary healthcare setting.
participants330 patients with a recent clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis in the coronary, cerebral, or peripheral arteries and with ≥2 treatable vascular risk factors not at goal.
interventionThe intervention consisted of a personalised website with an overview and actual status of patients' vascular risk factors, and mail communication with a nurse practitioner via the website for 12 months. The intervention combined self-management support, monitoring of disease control and pharmacotherapy.
main outcome measuresSocietal costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness.
resultsPatients experienced equal health benefits, that is, 0.86 vs 0.85 QALY (intervention vs usual care) at 1 year. Adjusting for baseline differences, the incremental QALY difference was -0.014 (95% CI -0.034 to 0.007). The intervention was associated with lower total costs (€4859 vs €5078, difference €219, 95% CI -€2301 to €1825). The probability that the intervention is cost-effective at a threshold value of €20,000/QALY, is 65%. At mean annual cost of €220 per patient, the intervention is relatively cheap.
conclusionsAn internet-based, nurse-led intervention in addition to usual care to improve vascular risk factors in patients with a clinical manifestation of a vascular disease does not result in a QALY gain at 1 year, but has a small effect on vascular risk factors and is associated with lower costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00785031.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.