Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995057›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2015

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Multi-Element Psychosocial Intervention for First-Episode Psychosis: Results From the Cluster-Randomized Controlled GET UP PIANO Trial in a Catchment Area of 10 Million Inhabitants.

Mirella Ruggeri, Chiara Bonetto, Antonio Lasalvia, Angelo Fioritti, Giovanni de Girolamo, Paolo Santonastaso, Francesca Pileggi, Giovanni Neri, Daniela Ghigi, Franco Giubilini and 23 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Specialised early intervention teams for recent-onset psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. A Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Trial of a Combined Clinical Treatment for First-Episode Psychosis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Mirella RuggeriDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy; mirella.ruggeri@univr.it.
Chiara BonettoDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
Antonio LasalviaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy;
Angelo FiorittiDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS Bologna, Bologna, Italy;
Giovanni de GirolamoScientific Direction, St John of God Clinical Research Centre of Brescia, Brescia, Lombardia, Italy;
Paolo SantonastasoDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy and Azienda Ospedaliera Padova, Italy;
Francesca PileggiDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS Bologna, Bologna, Italy;
Giovanni NeriDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS Modena, Modena, Italy; Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale, Regione Emilia Romagna, Italy;
Daniela GhigiDepartment of Mental Health, Rimini, Italy;
Franco GiubiliniDepartment of Mental Health, Parma, Italy;
Maurizio MiceliDepartment of Mental Health, Firenze, Italy;
Silvio ScaroneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Milano, Milano, Italy;
Angelo CocchiAO Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda Milano, MHD Programma 2000, Milan, Italy;
Stefano TorresaniDepartment of Mental Health, Bolzano, Italy;
Carlo FaravelliDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy;
Carla CremoneseDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda Ospedaliera Padova, Padova, Italy;
Paolo ScoccoDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS 16, Padova, Italy;
Emanuela LeuciDepartment of Mental Health, Parma, Italy;
Fausto MazziDepartment of Mental Health, Modena, Italy;
Michela PratelliDepartment of Mental Health, Rimini, Italy;
Francesca BelliniDepartment of Mental Health, Rimini, Italy;
Sarah TosatoDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy;
Katia De SantiDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy;
Sarah BissoliDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
Sara PoliDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
Elisa IraDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
Silvia ZoppeiDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
Paola RucciDepartment of Mental Health, Azienda ULSS Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Agenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale, Regione Emilia Romagna, Italy;
Laura BislenghiAO Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda Milano, MHD Programma 2000, Milan, Italy;
Giovanni PatelliAO Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda Milano, MHD Programma 2000, Milan, Italy;
Doriana CristofaloDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Policlinico G.B. Rossi, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy;
Anna MeneghelliAO Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda Milano, MHD Programma 2000, Milan, Italy;
GET UP Group
University of Verona · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITOspedale Infermi di Rimini · ITAgenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale · ITAzienda Ospedaliera di Padova · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITAzienda Sanitaria di Firenze · ITAzienda ULSS 9 TREVISO · ITAzienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena · ITOspedale di Bolzano · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrated multi-element psychosocial interventions have been suggested to improve the outcomes of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients, but they have been studied primarily in experimental settings and in nonepidemiologically representative samples. Thus, we performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial, comparing an integrated multi-element psychosocial intervention, comprising cognitive behavioral therapy, family intervention, and case management, with treatment as usual (TAU) for FEP patients in 117 community mental health centers (CMHCs) in a large area of northern Italy (10 million inhabitants). The randomized units (clusters) were the CMHCs, and the units of observation the patients (and, when available, their family members). The primary hypotheses were that add-on multicomponent intervention: (1) results in greater improvements in symptoms, as assessed with positive and negative syndrome scale and (2) reduces in-hospital stay, based on days of hospitalization over the 9-month follow-up. Four hundred and forty-four FEP patients received the intervention or TAU and were assessed at baseline and 9 months. Based on the retention rates of patients (and families) in the experimental arm, multi-element psychosocial interventions can be implemented in routine mental health services. Regarding primary outcomes, patients in the experimental arm showed greater reductions in overall symptom severity, while no difference could be found for days of hospitalization. Among the secondary outcomes, greater improvements were detected in the experimental arm for global functioning, emotional well-being, and subjective burden of delusions. No difference could be found for service disengagement and subjective burden of auditory hallucinations. These findings support feasibility and effectiveness of early interventions for psychosis in generalist mental health services.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health CentersOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdultCase ManagementCognitive Behavioral TherapyFamily TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePsychotic Disorderscognitive behavioral therapyearly psychosisfamily interventionoutcome assessmentschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID25995057
PMCPMC4535643
OpenAlexW1947819818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.