Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995053›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2015

A Novel Mechanism of Spine Damages in Stroke via DAPK1 and Tau.

Lei Pei, Shan Wang, Huijuan Jin, Linlin Bi, Na Wei, Honglin Yan, Xin Yang, Chengye Yao, Mengmeng Xu, Shu Shu and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. ACS omega · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Blocking ERK-DAPK1 Axis Attenuates Glutamate Excitotoxicity in Epilepsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei PeiDepartment of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shan WangDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huijuan JinDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Linlin BiDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Na WeiDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Honglin YanDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xin YangDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Chengye YaoDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Mengmeng XuDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shu ShuDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yu GuoDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huanhuan YanDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jianhua WuDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hao LiDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Pei PangDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Tian TianDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qing TianDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine and The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ling-Qiang ZhuDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine and The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
You ShangThe Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China Department of Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Youming LuDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medicine The Institute for Brain Research (IBR), Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China Department of Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic spine loss is one of the major preceding consequences of stroke damages, but its underlying molecular mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we report that a direct interaction of DAPK1 with Tau causes spine loss and subsequently neuronal death in a mouse model with stroke. We found that DAPK1 phosphorylates Tau protein at Ser262 (pS(262)) in cortical neurons of stroke mice. Either genetic deletion of DAPK1 kinase domain (KD) in mice (DAPK1-KD(-/-)) or blocking DAPK1-Tau interaction by systematic application of a membrane permeable peptide protects spine damages and improves neurological functions against stroke insults. Thus, disruption of DAPK1-Tau interaction is a promising strategy in clinical management of stroke.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCell DeathCells, CulturedCerebral CortexDeath-Associated Protein KinasesDendritic SpinesDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMotor ActivityNeurologic ExaminationNeuronsPeptidesDapk1 protein, mouseDeath-Associated Protein KinasesPeptidesPhosphopyruvate Hydratasetau ProteinsDAPK1dendritic spinestroketau phosphorylationtherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID25995053
PMCPMC4816799
OpenAlexW2154499565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.