Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25995019›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2016

Multi-institutional validation of a novel textural analysis tool for preoperative stratification of suspected thyroid tumors on diffusion-weighted MRI.

Anna M Brown, Sidhartha Nagala, Mary A McLean, Yonggang Lu, Daniel Scoffings, Aditya Apte, Mithat Gonen, Hilda E Stambuk, Ashok R Shaha, R Michael Tuttle and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Radiomic biomarkers for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anna M BrownCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sidhartha NagalaAddenbrooke's Hospital Department of Otolaryngology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mary A McLeanCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Yonggang LuDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Daniel ScoffingsAddenbrooke's Hospital Department of Radiology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Aditya ApteDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mithat GonenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Hilda E StambukDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ashok R ShahaDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
R Michael TuttleDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Joseph O DeasyDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew N PriestAddenbrooke's Hospital Department of Radiology, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9771-4290
Piyush JaniCambridge Teaching Hospitals ENT Department, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Amita Shukla-DaveDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
John GriffithsCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE in Thyroid CancerP50CA172012 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI FAGIN, JAMES A · 2014 to 2018
$10.3M
Predictive MRI metrics for tumor aggressiveness in micropapillary thyroid cancerR21CA176660 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DAVE, AMITA · 2014 to 2015
$737k
Cancer Research UK 11562Cancer Research UK C14303/A17197NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA176660-01A1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA172012NCI NIH HHS P50 CA172012-01A1NCI NIH HHS R21 CA176660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUltrasound-guided fine needle aspirate cytology fails to diagnose many malignant thyroid nodules; consequently, patients may undergo diagnostic lobectomy. This study assessed whether textural analysis (TA) could noninvasively stratify thyroid nodules accurately using diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI).

methodsThis multi-institutional study examined 3T DW-MRI images obtained with spin echo echo planar imaging sequences. The training data set included 26 patients from Cambridge, United Kingdom, and the test data set included 18 thyroid cancer patients from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, New York, USA). Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were compared over regions of interest (ROIs) defined on thyroid nodules. TA, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and feature reduction were performed using the 21 MaZda-generated texture parameters that best distinguished benign and malignant ROIs.

resultsTraining data set mean ADC values were significantly different for benign and malignant nodules (P = 0.02) with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 63%, respectively, and a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73. The LDA model of the top 21 textural features correctly classified 89/94 DW-MRI ROIs with 92% sensitivity, 96% specificity, and an AUC of 0.97. This algorithm correctly classified 16/18 (89%) patients in the independently obtained test set of thyroid DW-MRI scans.

conclusionTA classifies thyroid nodules with high sensitivity and specificity on multi-institutional DW-MRI data sets. This method requires further validation in a larger prospective study. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveCohort StudiesDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsThyroid GlandThyroid Neoplasmsdiffusion-weighted MRItextural analysisthyroid tumors

Identifiers

PMID25995019
PMCPMC4654719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.