Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994977›Full record

ArticleWorkplace health & safety2015

Developing blended online and classroom strategies to deliver an occupational health nursing overview course in a multi-state region in the United States.

A B de Castro, Erin Shapleigh, Annie Bruck, Mary K Salazar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Workplace health & safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A B de CastroUniversity of Washington Bothell University of Washington, Seattle BdeCastro@uwb.edu.
Erin ShapleighUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Annie BruckUniversity of Washington Bothell.
Mary K SalazarUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
University of Washington · USSeattle University · USUniversity of Washington Bothell · US

Funding

University of Washington Education and Research CenterT42OH008433 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER D · 2005 to 2024
$29.4M
ACL HHS T42OH008433NIOSH CDC HHS 3T42OH008433NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes how hybrid online and classroom learning approaches were used to design and offer an occupational health nursing review course throughout a multi-state region of the northwest United States. In response to demand from practicing occupational health nurses for board certification preparation, a series of asynchronous and synchronous continuing education modules was created covering a range of occupational health nursing topics. This review course illustrates how innovative educational delivery models can serve the needs of occupational health nurses challenged by geographic and time constraints.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionCertificationCurriculumEducation, Nursing, ContinuingHumansOccupational Health NursingProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationUnited Statesboard certificationcontinuing educationdistance learningoccupational health nursing

Identifiers

PMID25994977
PMCPMC5570582
OpenAlexW2414475579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.