Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994967›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2015

Donor Requirements for Regulatory T Cell Suppression of Murine Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Antonio Pierini, Lucrezia Colonna, Maite Alvarez, Dominik Schneidawind, Hidekazu Nishikii, Jeanette Baker, Yuqiong Pan, Mareike Florek, Byung-Su Kim, Robert S Negrin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06845592 (SHARP - Safely Delivered Targeted High-dose Irradiation Followed by Adoptive Immunotherapy with Regulatory and Conventional T Cells to Increase Potency of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in High-risk Acute Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06845592 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

SHARP - Safely Delivered Targeted High-dose Irradiation Followed by Adoptive Immunotherapy with Regulatory and Conventional T Cells to Increase Potency of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in High-risk Acute Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Of PerugiaRan2025 to 2031Enrolled51ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ALL, High Risk Leukaemia, Leukaemia RelapseArmstotal marrow/lymphoid irradiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Donor-derived CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Blinatumomab Redirects Donor Lymphocytes against CD19International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio PieriniBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and.
Lucrezia ColonnaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109.
Maite AlvarezBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and.
Dominik SchneidawindBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and.
Hidekazu NishikiiBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and.
Jeanette BakerBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and.
Yuqiong PanBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and.
Mareike FlorekBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and.
Byung-Su KimBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and.
Robert S NegrinBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; and negrs@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Blood Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

TUMOR SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTES IN BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATIONP01CA049605 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI David B. Miklos · 1989 to 2026
$73.3M
TLI/ATG CONDTIONING: KIDNEY/BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANTSP01HL075462 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ENGLEMAN, EDGAR G. · 2004 to 2020
$27.9M
Regulatory T cells in allogeneic transplantationR01HL114591 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NEGRIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2016
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA49605NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049605NHLBI NIH HHS HL075462NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL075462NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive transfer of freshly isolated natural occurring CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) prevents graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in several animal models and following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in clinical trials. Donor-derived Treg have been mainly used, as they share the same MHC with CD4(+) and CD8(+) conventional T cells (Tcon) that are primarily responsible for GVHD. Third party-derived Treg are a promising alternative for cellular therapy, as they can be prepared in advance, screened for pathogens and activity, and banked. We explored MHC disparities between Treg and Tcon in HCT to evaluate the impact of different Treg populations in GVHD prevention and survival. Third-party Treg and donor Treg are equally suppressive in ex vivo assays, whereas both donor and third-party but not host Treg protect from GVHD in allogeneic HCT, with donor Treg being the most effective. In an MHC minor mismatched transplantation model (C57BL/6 → BALB/b), donor and third-party Treg were equally effective in controlling GVHD. Furthermore, using an in vivo Treg depletion mouse model, we found that Treg exert their main suppressive activity in the first 2 d after transplantation. Third-party Treg survive for a shorter period of time after adoptive transfer, but despite the shorter survival, they control Tcon proliferation in the early phases of HCT. These studies provide relevant insights on the mechanisms of Treg-mediated protection from GVHD and support for the use of third-party Treg in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdoptive TransferAnimalsBiomarkersCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell ProliferationForkhead Transcription FactorsGene ExpressionGraft vs Host DiseaseHistocompatibility TestingInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha SubunitMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLTissue DonorsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryBiomarkersForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxp3 protein, mouseInterleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit

Identifiers

PMID25994967
PMCPMC4475671
OpenAlexW1895371600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.