ArticleJournal of human genetics2015
Brachydactyly Type C patient with compound heterozygosity for p.Gly319Val and p.Ile358Thr variants in the GDF5 proregion: benign variants or mutations?
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report on a Brachydactyly Type C (BDC) patient with clinically inconspicuous parents. Molecular genetic analyses revealed compound heterozygosity for two GDF5 variants. The variant c.956G>T (p.Gly319Val) was inherited from her mother and has been reported in exome sequencing projects, whereas c.1073T>C (p.Ile358Thr) has never been reported so far. In silico, both variants were predicted to be 'disease-causing', but the fact that p.Ile358Thr was predicted by SIFT to be 'tolerated' raised our suspicion. Therefore, we performed in vitro assays. To our surprise, GDF5(G319V) showed pronounced loss of function in luciferase reporter assays and in vitro chondrogenesis, whereas GDF5(I358T) and GDF5(WT) had comparable biological activities. Western blot analyses revealed decreased protein levels after overexpression of GDF5(G319V). In absence of linkage or de novo mutation, several scenarios could explain the underlying mechanism of the patient's phenotype. Owing to reduced activity of GDF5(G319V) in our functional assays, p.Gly319Val might be causative for BDC, but typically evoke an unrecognizably mild phenotype or even nonpenetrance. Another possibility is that our assays failed to pinpoint the disease-causing mechanism of the p.Ile358Thr allele. A final possibility is that compound heterozygosity for p.Ile358Thr and p.Gly319Val is more deleterious to GDF5 activity than either variant alone. Until all possible explanations can be rigorously tested experimentally, a precise recurrence risk counseling for the parents and the affected child is not possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25994865What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.