Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994703›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2015

Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.

Kyle P Walsh, Edward G Pasanen, Dennis McFadden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Parametric information about eye movements is sent to the ears.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Reveal an Efficient Auditory Efferent Network.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Click-Evoked Auditory Efferent Activity: Rate and Level Effects.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The eardrums move when the eyes move: A multisensory effect on the mechanics of hearing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kyle P WalshDepartment of Psychology and Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, Texas 78712-0187, USA.
Edward G PasanenDepartment of Psychology and Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, Texas 78712-0187, USA.
Dennis McFaddenDepartment of Psychology and Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, Texas 78712-0187, USA.

Funding

Group and Individual Differences in AuditionR01DC000153 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI MCFADDEN, DENNIS · 1989 to 2010
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that the otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) measured during behavioral tasks can have different magnitudes when subjects are attending selectively or not attending. The implication is that the cognitive and perceptual demands of a task can affect the first neural stage of auditory processing-the sensory receptors themselves. However, the directions of the reported attentional effects have been inconsistent, the magnitudes of the observed differences typically have been small, and comparisons across studies have been made difficult by significant procedural differences. In this study, a nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency OAE (SFOAE), called the nSFOAE, was used to measure cochlear responses from human subjects while they simultaneously performed behavioral tasks requiring selective auditory attention (dichotic or diotic listening), selective visual attention, or relative inattention. Within subjects, the differences in nSFOAE magnitude between inattention and attention conditions were about 2-3 dB for both auditory and visual modalities, and the effect sizes for the differences typically were large for both nSFOAE magnitude and phase. These results reveal that the cochlear efferent reflex is differentially active during selective attention and inattention, for both auditory and visual tasks, although they do not reveal how attention is improved when efferent activity is greater.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory PerceptionOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousVisual PerceptionAcousticsAcoustic StimulationAdultCochleaCognitionDichotic Listening TestsEfferent PathwaysFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleNonlinear Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID25994703
PMCPMC4441704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.