Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994678›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Three spectrally distinct photoreceptors in diurnal and nocturnal Australian ants.

Yuri Ogawa, Marcin Falkowski, Ajay Narendra, Jochen Zeil, Jan M Hemmi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Colour vision in ants (Formicidae, Hymenoptera).Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Colour vision in nocturnal insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Mechanisms of spectral orientation in a diurnal dung beetle.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. NocturnaliScience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Subtle changes in the landmark panorama disrupt visual navigation in a nocturnal bull ant.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How do field of view and resolution affect the information content of panoramic scenes for visual navigation? A computational investigation.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2016
    Article
  16. Three-dimensional models of natural environments and the mapping of navigational information.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuri OgawaSchool of Animal Biology and UWA Oceans Institute (M092), The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia yuri.ogawa@uwa.edu.au.
Marcin FalkowskiSchool of Animal Biology and UWA Oceans Institute (M092), The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Ajay NarendraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia.
Jochen ZeilResearch School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia.
Jan M HemmiSchool of Animal Biology and UWA Oceans Institute (M092), The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Australian National University · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AUMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ants are thought to be special among Hymenopterans in having only dichromatic colour vision based on two spectrally distinct photoreceptors. Many ants are highly visual animals, however, and use vision extensively for navigation. We show here that two congeneric day- and night-active Australian ants have three spectrally distinct photoreceptor types, potentially supporting trichromatic colour vision. Electroretinogram recordings show the presence of three spectral sensitivities with peaks (λmax) at 370, 450 and 550 nm in the night-active Myrmecia vindex and peaks at 370, 470 and 510 nm in the day-active Myrmecia croslandi. Intracellular electrophysiology on individual photoreceptors confirmed that the night-active M. vindex has three spectral sensitivities with peaks (λmax) at 370, 430 and 550 nm. A large number of the intracellular recordings in the night-active M. vindex show unusually broad-band spectral sensitivities, suggesting that photoreceptors may be coupled. Spectral measurements at different temporal frequencies revealed that the ultraviolet receptors are comparatively slow. We discuss the adaptive significance and the probability of trichromacy in Myrmecia ants in the context of dim light vision and visual navigation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntsAustraliaCircadian RhythmColor VisionElectroretinographyPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateSpatial Navigationantscolour visionnavigationphotoreceptorsspectral sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID25994678
PMCPMC4455814
OpenAlexW1931161577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.