Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994677›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Sensory-based niche partitioning in a multiple predator - multiple prey community.

Jay J Falk, Hannah M ter Hofstede, Patricia L Jones, Marjorie M Dixon, Paul A Faure, Elisabeth K V Kalko, Rachel A Page

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Extensive data engineering to the rescue: building a multi-species katydid detector from unbalanced, atypical training datasets.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Hearing sensitivity: An underlying mechanism for niche differentiation in gleaning bats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jay J FalkDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092 Balboa, Ancón, Panama jjf266@cornell.edu.
Hannah M ter HofstedeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Patricia L JonesDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092 Balboa, Ancón, Panama.
Marjorie M DixonDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092 Balboa, Ancón, Panama.
Paul A FaureDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4L8.
Elisabeth K V KalkoDepartment of Experimental Ecology, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092 Balboa, Ancón, Panama.
Rachel A PageSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092 Balboa, Ancón, Panama.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many predators and parasites eavesdrop on the communication signals of their prey. Eavesdropping is typically studied as dyadic predator-prey species interactions; yet in nature, most predators target multiple prey species and most prey must evade multiple predator species. The impact of predator communities on prey signal evolution is not well understood. Predators could converge in their preferences for conspicuous signal properties, generating competition among predators and natural selection on particular prey signal features. Alternatively, predator species could vary in their preferences for prey signal properties, resulting in sensory-based niche partitioning of prey resources. In the Neotropics, many substrate-gleaning bats use the mate-attraction songs of male katydids to locate them as prey. We studied mechanisms of niche partitioning in four substrate-gleaning bat species and found they are similar in morphology, echolocation signal design and prey-handling ability, but each species preferred different acoustic features of male song in 12 sympatric katydid species. This divergence in predator preference probably contributes to the coexistence of many substrate-gleaning bat species in the Neotropics, and the substantial diversity in the mate-attraction signals of katydids. Our results provide insight into how multiple eavesdropping predator species might influence prey signal evolution through sensory-based niche partitioning.

Indexed as

Predatory BehaviorVocalization, AnimalAnimalsChiropteraEcholocationEcosystemFood ChainMaleOrthopteraPanamaeavesdroppinggleaning batskatydidspredator–prey diversitysensory-based niche partitioning

Identifiers

PMID25994677
PMCPMC4455811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.