Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994657›Full record

ArticleNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2015

Con: Biomarkers in glomerular diseases: putting the cart before the wheel?

An S De Vriese, Fernando C Fervenza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Molecular Imaging of the Glomerulus via Mesangial Cell Uptake of Radiolabeled Tilmanocept.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  2. Nephrology research--the past, present and future.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

An S De VrieseDivision of Nephrology, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge 8000, Belgium.
Fernando C FervenzaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers have been increasingly sought to improve diagnosis as well as predict prognosis and/or response to therapy. However, they should not replace sound clinical judgment and therapeutic measures. The present article aims to highlight the issues with biomarker research in three selected entities. In focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, many studies fail to differentiate cases of primary versus secondary forms leading to conclusions that are uninterpretable. Biomarkers have also been sought to predict development of diabetic nephropathy but this research should not supersede efforts aimed to optimize treatment of diabetes. Finally, in lupus nephritis (LN), biomarkers so far have failed to prove value in clinical practice. The concept of immunological remission should be added to the concept of clinical remission when judging response to immunosuppressive therapy in LN. In addition, the appropriate time frame for remission to occur should be reconsidered.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsBiomarkersDiabetic NephropathiesGlomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalHumansKidney DiseasesLupus NephritisPrognosisBiomarkersbiomarkersdiabetic nephropathyfocal segmental glomerulosclerosisglomerularlupus nephritis

Identifiers

PMID25994657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.