Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994549›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2015

A Synthetic Influenza Virus Vaccine Induces a Cellular Immune Response That Correlates with Reduction in Symptomatology and Virus Shedding in a Randomized Phase Ib Live-Virus Challenge in Humans.

Olga Pleguezuelos, Stuart Robinson, Ana Fernández, Gregory A Stoloff, Alex Mann, Anthony Gilbert, Ganesh Balaratnam, Tom Wilkinson, Rob Lambkin-Williams, John Oxford and 1 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01226758 phase1completednot on this map

A Randomised Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 1b Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Protective Efficacy of the Influenza Vaccine Candidate, FLU-v, in an Influenza Challenge Model

TypeinterventionalSponsorPepTcell LimitedRan2010 to 2010Enrolled32ConditionsInfluenzaArmsInfluenza vaccine (FLU-v), Placebo (adjuvant only)
NCT02962908 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Single-centre Phase IIb Trial as Part of the EU-funded UNISEC Project to Assess the Immunogenicity and Safety of Different Formulations and Dosing Regimens of FLU-v Vaccine in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorPepTcell LimitedRan2016 to 2017Enrolled175ConditionsInfluenzaArmsFLU-v, adjuvanted FLU-v, Saline, Adjuvanted placebo
NCT03180801 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Phase IIb Study of the Efficacy of FLU-v, a Broad Spectrum Influenza Vaccine in an H1N1 Influenza Healthy Human Challenge Model

TypeinterventionalSponsorPepTcell LimitedRan2016 to 2017Enrolled153ConditionsInfluenzaArmsadjuvanted FLU-v, adjuvanted placebo, Influenza challenge
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Immunity to Influenza Infection in Humans.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga PleguezuelosSEEK, Central Point, London, United Kingdom.
Stuart RobinsonSEEK, Central Point, London, United Kingdom.
Ana FernándezSEEK, Central Point, London, United Kingdom.
Gregory A StoloffSEEK, Central Point, London, United Kingdom.
Alex MannRetroscreen Virology Ltd., Queen Mary BioEnterprises, Innovation Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Anthony GilbertRetroscreen Virology Ltd., Queen Mary BioEnterprises, Innovation Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Ganesh BalaratnamRetroscreen Virology Ltd., Queen Mary BioEnterprises, Innovation Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Tom WilkinsonClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Rob Lambkin-WilliamsRetroscreen Virology Ltd., Queen Mary BioEnterprises, Innovation Centre, London, United Kingdom.
John OxfordRetroscreen Virology Ltd., Queen Mary BioEnterprises, Innovation Centre, London, United Kingdom Blizzard Institute, Queen Mary College, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Wilson Caparrós-WanderleySEEK, Central Point, London, United Kingdom wilson.wanderley@seekacure.com.
Peptcell (United Kingdom) · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current influenza vaccines elicit primarily antibody-based immunity. They require yearly revaccination and cannot be manufactured until the identification of the circulating viral strain(s). These issues remain to be addressed. Here we report a phase Ib trial of a vaccine candidate (FLU-v) eliciting cellular immunity. Thirty-two males seronegative for the challenge virus by hemagglutination inhibition assay participated in this single-center, randomized, double-blind study. Volunteers received one dose of either the adjuvant alone (placebo, n = 16) or FLU-v (500 μg) and the adjuvant (n = 16), both in saline. Twenty-one days later, FLU-v (n = 15) and placebo (n = 13) volunteers were challenged with influenza virus A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2) and monitored for 7 days. Safety, tolerability, and cellular responses were assessed pre- and postvaccination. Virus shedding and clinical signs were assessed postchallenge. FLU-v was safe and well tolerated. No difference in the prevaccination FLU-v-specific gamma interferon (IFN-γ) response was seen between groups (average ± the standard error of the mean [SEM] for the placebo and FLU-v, respectively, 1.4-fold ± 0.2-fold and 1.6-fold ± 0.5-fold higher than the negative-control value). Nineteen days postvaccination, the FLU-v group, but not the placebo group, developed FLU-v-specific IFN-γ responses (8.2-fold ± 3.9-fold versus 1.3-fold ± 0.1-fold higher than the negative-control value [average ± SEM] for FLU-v versus the placebo [P = 0.0005]). FLU-v-specific cellular responses also correlated with reductions in both viral titers (P = 0.01) and symptom scores (P = 0.02) postchallenge. Increased cellular immunity specific to FLU-v correlates with reductions in both symptom scores and virus loads. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01226758 and at hra.nhs.uk under EudraCT no. 2009-014716-35.).

Indexed as

Immunity, CellularAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodHealthy VolunteersHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInterferon-gammaLeukocytes, MononuclearMaleMiddle AgedPlacebosViral LoadVirus SheddingYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesInterferon-gammaPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID25994549
PMCPMC4478518
OpenAlexW2042762788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.