Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994497›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2015

Imaging patients with renal colic-consider ultrasound first.

Carlos Nicolau, Michel Claudon, Lorenzo E Derchi, E Jane Adam, Michael Bachmann Nielsen, Gerhard Mostbeck, Catherine M Owens, Christiane Nyhsen, Spyros Yarmenitis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Ultrasonography of the Kidney: A Pictorial Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Carlos NicolauRadiology Department, Hospital Clinic, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain, cnicolau@clinic.cat.
Michel Claudon
Lorenzo E Derchi
E Jane Adam
Michael Bachmann Nielsen
Gerhard Mostbeck
Catherine M Owens
Christiane Nyhsen
Spyros Yarmenitis
Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBHygeia Hospital · GRRigshospitalet · DKSt George's Hospital · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of Genoa · ITWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledRenal colic is a common disease in Europe and a common cause of visit to the Emergency Department. Clinical diagnosis is usually confirmed by imaging modalities. Unenhanced computed tomography (CT) is considered the best diagnostic test due to its excellent accuracy detecting ureteral stones. However, ultrasound (US) should be considered as the primary imaging technique. It is a reproducible, non-invasive and non-expensive imaging technique, achieving accurate diagnosis in most cases without the need for radiation. Diagnosis is based on the presence of ureteral stones, but indirect findings such as the asymmetry or absence of ureteric jet, an increase of the resistive index or a colour Doppler twinkling artefact may help to suggest the diagnosis when the stone is not identified. MAIN MESSAGES: • Renal colic diagnosis is usually confirmed by imaging modalities. • Imaging diagnosis of renal colic is based on the detection of ureteral stones. • CT is the most accurate imaging technique to identify ureteral stones. • US allows correct diagnosis in most cases without using radiation. • US should be used as the first imaging modality in patients with renal colic.

Identifiers

PMID25994497
PMCPMC4519809
OpenAlexW1849235222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.