Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25994494›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2015

Two key genomic regions harbour QTLs for salinity tolerance in ICCV 2 × JG 11 derived chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) recombinant inbred lines.

Raju Pushpavalli, Laxmanan Krishnamurthy, Mahendar Thudi, Pooran M Gaur, Mandali V Rao, Kadambot H M Siddique, Timothy D Colmer, Neil C Turner, Rajeev K Varshney, Vincent Vadez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Chickpea (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Comprehensive Review on Chickpea (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Salinity tolerance mechanisms and their breeding implications.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  17. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raju PushpavalliInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 234, Telangana State, India. pushpavalli11@gmail.com.
Laxmanan KrishnamurthyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 234, Telangana State, India. l.krishnamurthy@cgiar.org.
Mahendar ThudiInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 234, Telangana State, India. t.mahendar@cgiar.org.
Pooran M GaurInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 234, Telangana State, India. r.k.varshney@cgiar.org.
Mandali V RaoDepartment of Plant Science, Bharathidasan University, 620024, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India. p.gaur@cgiar.org.
Kadambot H M SiddiqueThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, 6009, Crawley, WA, Australia. neil.turner@uwa.edu.au.
Timothy D ColmerSchool of Plant Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, 6009, , Crawley, WA, Australia. mvrao_456@yahoo.co.in.
Neil C TurnerThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, 6009, Crawley, WA, Australia. timothy.colmer@uwa.edu.au.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 234, Telangana State, India. kadambot.siddique@uwa.edu.au.
Vincent VadezInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru 502 234, Telangana State, India. v.vadez@cgiar.org.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INUniversity of Western Australia · AUBharathidasan University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), an important food legume crop, is sensitive to salinity, considerable variation for salinity tolerance exists in the germplasm. To improve any existing cultivar, it is important to understand the genetic and physiological mechanisms underlying this tolerance.

resultsIn the present study, 188 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from the cross ICCV 2 × JG 11 were used to assess yield and related traits in a soil with 0 mM NaCl (control) and 80 mM NaCl (salinity) over two consecutive years. Salinity significantly (P < 0.05) affected almost all traits across years and yield reduction was in large part related to a reduction in seed number but also a reduction in above ground biomass. A genetic map was constructed using 56 polymorphic markers (28 simple sequence repeats; SSRs and 28 single nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs). The QTL analysis revealed two key genomic regions on CaLG05 (28.6 cM) and on CaLG07 (19.4 cM), that harboured QTLs for six and five different salinity tolerance associated traits, respectively, and imparting either higher plant vigour (on CaLG05) or higher reproductive success (on CaLG07). Two major QTLs for yield in the salinity treatment (explaining 12 and 17% of the phenotypic variation) were identified within the two key genomic regions. Comparison with already published chickpea genetic maps showed that these regions conferred salinity tolerance across two other populations and the markers can be deployed for enhancing salinity tolerance in chickpea. Based on the gene ontology annotation, forty eight putative candidate genes responsive to salinity stress were found on CaLG05 (31 genes) and CaLG07 (17 genes) in a distance of 11.1 Mb and 8.2 Mb on chickpea reference genome. Most of the genes were known to be involved in achieving osmoregulation under stress conditions.

conclusionIdentification of putative candidate genes further strengthens the idea of using CaLG05 and CaLG07 genomic regions for marker assisted breeding (MAB). Further fine mapping of these key genomic regions may lead to novel gene identification for salinity stress tolerance in chickpea.

Indexed as

Crosses, GeneticGenome, PlantInbreedingAnalysis of VarianceBiomassChromosome MappingCicerData MiningGenetic Association StudiesGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersInheritance PatternsQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociRecombination, GeneticSalinityGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25994494
PMCPMC4440540
OpenAlexW1895755211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.